What math field is this called?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kramer733
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Field
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the abstraction of graphing equations and the arbitrary nature of the Cartesian coordinate system. It highlights how different coordinate systems, such as logarithmic or polar, can drastically change the representation of functions. The conversation emphasizes that mathematics often seeks to describe functions through equations or properties rather than solely through graphs. Additionally, it notes that certain mathematical fields, like linear algebra and differential geometry, prioritize a coordinate-free approach. Overall, the exploration of graph representation underscores the flexibility and abstraction inherent in mathematical concepts.
kramer733
Messages
322
Reaction score
0
Where you just study the graphs of equations but more abstractly. Don't you think that intuitively the cartesian coordinate system makes sense but at the same time, it's arbitrary? We could have made the left hand side the positive numbers and the right hand side the negative numbers.

Graphs depend on this don't they? So why don't we abstract these ideas more? We could have really inverted and more weird graphs. Don't the picture of the graphs depend on how we define how a function is drawn?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Yep, if you use a logarithmic axis then suddenly exponential functions are drawn as straight lines, and when you have a polar curve r(\theta) you can plot it in polar coordinates (x = r \cos\theta, y = r \sin\theta) or you can plot r vs. \theta (x = r, y = r(\theta)) and it looks completely different.
This is why mathematics usually tries to describe the functions in another way (e.g. as the solution of some equation, or by certain properties) rather than just giving it as a graph.

Note that some branches of mathematics - especially those like linear algebra and differential geometry, which are heavily influenced by physics - make quite a point out of writing things in a coordinate free way.
 
If f:S-->T is any function, the graph of f is a subset of the cartesian product SxT, consisting of all ordered pairs (s,t) such that t = f(s). You can picture this product space anyway you want or not at all.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top