Arctan of a fraction of two tangents?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter huey910
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fraction
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
7 replies · 8K views
huey910
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
if:

arctan[tan(f(x))/tan(g(x))]

then,

f(x)/tan(g(x)) ?

Is this correct or does the tan function at the denominator also vanish?

Please advise
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
huey910 said:
if:

arctan[tan(f(x))/tan(g(x))]

then,

f(x)/tan(g(x)) ?

Is this correct or does the tan function at the denominator also vanish?

Please advise

No, both are not correct.
Where is no simple formula of this kind.
 
Nothing as simple as the OP wants, clearly, but there is an interesting elementary way to "split" the arctangent of a ratio into a sum of arctangents.

Start with this:

[itex]\frac{\tan x + \tan y}{1 - {\tan x}{\tan y}} = \tan{(x+y)}[/itex]

Put [itex]A = \tan{x}, B = \tan{y}[/itex]

[itex]\frac{A + B}{1 - AB} = \tan{(\arctan{A}+\arctan{B})}[/itex]

Finally take arctan of both sides:

[itex]\arctan{(\frac{A + B}{1 - AB})} = \arctan{A}+\arctan{B}[/itex]

This is a pretty nifty formula that works both ways: to convert the arctan of a quotient to a sum of arctans, and vice versa.

To see how to do it the first way, let's say we want to convert the expression for [itex]\arctan({\frac{f}{g}})[/itex] into a sum of arctangents.

We start by setting up the simult. eqn. pair:

[itex]A + B = f[/itex] ---eqn 1

[itex]1 - AB = g[/itex] ---eqn 2

Solving those gives:

[itex]A = \frac{f \pm \sqrt{f^2 + 4(g-1)}}{2}[/itex]

and [itex]B = \frac{f \mp \sqrt{f^2 + 4(g-1)}}{2}[/itex]

giving the result as:

[itex]\arctan({\frac{f}{g}}) = \arctan{(\frac{f + \sqrt{f^2 + 4(g-1)}}{2})} + \arctan{(\frac{f - \sqrt{f^2 + 4(g-1)}}{2})}[/itex]

As I said, this is probably not what the OP was looking for (or thinking of), but it's an interesting result I thought bore mentioning.
 
Very nice Curious, I like the trick. +1
 
If "smart" is the good word, I would say : Smart !
 
Thanks to the above 2 posters for the nice compliments. :smile:

In fact, this is also a nice way to see this beautiful relationship:

[tex]\arctan \phi - \arctan \frac{1}{\phi} = \arctan \frac{1}{2}[/tex]

where [itex]\phi[/itex] is the golden ratio 1.618...

EDIT: Sorry, made a sign error in my original post. Micromass and others - please take note.
 
Last edited:
Curious3141 said:
Thanks to the above 2 posters for the nice compliments. :smile:

In fact, this is also a nice way to see this beautiful relationship:

[tex]\arctan \phi + \arctan \frac{1}{\phi} = \arctan \frac{1}{2}[/tex]

where [itex]\phi[/itex] is the golden ratio 1.618...

Very nice! :approve:

Yes, math can be beautiful indeed...
 
This is the correct relationship (reposted as I don't want anyone to get it wrong on account of my original typo):

[tex]\arctan \phi - \arctan \frac{1}{\phi} = \arctan \frac{1}{2}[/tex]