What is the Difference Between Magnetic Moment and Magnetic Domain?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies the distinction between magnetic moments and magnetic domains. A magnetic moment refers to the alignment of an atom's subatomic particles in relation to a magnetic field, while magnetic domains are groups of aligned magnetic moments within a material. In ferromagnetic materials, these domains exhibit uniform alignment, but different domains can point in various directions. The conversation also touches on the behavior of electrons in a magnetic field, noting that spin moments align with the field while orbital moments precess, contributing to the overall magnetic properties. Ultimately, the alignment and interaction of these moments determine the material's magnetization characteristics.
gbaby370
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
Just for clarification, I was wondering if someone could clarify what the difference between a magnetic moment and magnetic domain is. My understanding is a magnetic moment is when the atom aligns it's subatomic particles relative to the magnetic field, and that a magnetic domain is groups of magnetic moments that align relative to the magnetic field.

If anyone could clear that up for me that would be great.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi gbaby370! :smile:

a magnetic moment is simply one or more loops of current, facing in a particular direction

all materials have these, but in most materials their directions are random

in a ferromagnetic material, they aren't random …

the material is divided into "magnetic domains", and the magnetic moments in one domain all point in the same direction, but different domains have different directions

see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_domain for details :wink:
 
So if we apply a magnetic field, for example to a hydrogen atom. What would it be called when it's protons and electrons align themselves relevant to the applied magnetic field?
 
gbaby370 said:
So if we apply a magnetic field, for example to a hydrogen atom. What would it be called when it's protons and electrons align themselves relevant to the applied magnetic field?

a single hydrogen atom? :confused: it only has one proton and one electron

i suppose we'd call it "alignment"
 
From what I remember :
Each electron has two magnetic moments: spin magnetic moment and orbital magnetic moment . The two have equal magnitudes but reacts differently to the applied field. Spin moment tends to align with the applied field but the orbit one does not alight but rather precess around the the field because they have angular momentum. The result of this precession is a small induced magnetization "opposite" to the applied field ( diamagnetism).
On the other hand, spin moment tends to align with the applied field ( after some periods of damped precession) and results in an induced magnetization "parallel" with the applied field. Spin moments of paired electrons are cancelled. For unpaired electrons, the sum of orbital and spin moments determines the magnetization of the material though it spin contribution is larger by about 3 orders of magnitudes.

Except for ferromagnetic materials, the parallelization of spin moments is partial because electrostatic interactions and thermal energy does not allow it. In ferromagnetic materials, there is exchange interaction which keeps the spins of neighboring atoms parallel. Exchange interaction is so strong that it keeps the spins parallel for temperature bellow the material's Curie temperature and form domains which are a a large number of parallel moments. Note that the direction of spins in a domain is not necessarily parallel with the applied field.

In Hydrogen molecules ( H2) we have two electrons in S orbit so their spin moments are canceled and H2 becomes diamagentic.
 
Last edited:
nice summary, Hassan2! :smile:
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...

Similar threads

Back
Top