Schools Trouble in Discrete math will it affect my graduate school opportunities?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a student's struggles with Discrete Mathematics, particularly with proofs by induction, which has led to poor quiz performance and concerns about maintaining a strong GPA for graduate school applications in nuclear engineering. Despite a solid academic record in other subjects, the student fears that a low grade in this course could jeopardize their chances of acceptance into prestigious programs. Responses emphasize that difficulties with proof writing are common and suggest strategies for improvement, including actively engaging with proofs, understanding theorems thoroughly, and seeking help from professors when needed. The importance of perseverance and a proactive approach to learning is highlighted as essential for success in mathematics.
Hercuflea
Messages
593
Reaction score
49
Hello everyone,

I'm a first time poster and I just want to say this forum is great. Every time I have a question Physics Forums is the first site to answer it.

So lately I have been really struggling in my Discrete Mathematics I course at my university. This is one of the few times in college (127 credit hours - 3.8 GPA) that I have had trouble in a class because I legitimately did not understand it. The thing that is giving me the most trouble is, predictably, Proofs by Induction. It doesn't help that I have absolutely no idea what kind of problem my professor will throw at me on the quizzes or test. Today I failed a quiz because my mind just went absolutely blank on an induction proof.

One of the proof that stumped me went something like this:

Prove by math induction that P(n): 1+4+7+...+(3n-2) = (n(3n+1))/2Anyways, I am worried that I may get a B or even a C in this class, and I really want to be accepted into a Master's or Ph. D. program in nuclear engineering (preferably Ga Tech, maybe UMich-Ann Arbor). If worst comes to worst would I still have a chance at being accepted into a good PhD program in that field? I have made nearly perfect 100's in my Calc 1-3, chemistry, and Linear algebra, and I am doing satisfactory in differential equations.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sorry, I forgot to add that I am a Math major - my school does not offer any physics or engineering degree programs, and I recently switched from Economics, so math was the best option for me.
 
bump - an answer would be nice

and an update: I just got another 78 on a quiz on basic counting principles (pigeonhole, etc) I seriously thought I had a perfect 100 on it when I walked out of there. Now I feel like sh**
 
I highly doubt it because discrete math isn't used in Nuclear engineering.
 
Thanks, I just hate to think about what it might do to my gpa
 
Hercuflea said:
...my school does not offer any physics or engineering degree programs...

If you're planning on pursuing graduate studies in engineering, the above is likely to be more of an issue than your grade in discrete math.

Regarding your struggles with writing proofs; a first course in proof writing is awkward for most students. If you need more practice with induction and the pigeonhole principle, then grab some resources and start reading proofs which use these concepts. However, do not simply read through them and move on when you feel like you understand them; you should verify each claim for yourself and try to prove things on your own. This is the only way to become proficient at proving things. I'll quote/paraphrase Hungerford's message to the student in his introductory abstract algebra text, which still applies to your discrete math course:
Read the text with pencil and paper in hand before looking at the exercises. When you read the statement of a theorem, be sure you know the meaning of all the terms in the statement of the theorem. For example, if it says "every finite integral domain is a field," review the definitions of "integral domain" and "field" -- if necessary, look up the definitions online or in another text.

Once you understand what the theorem claims is true, then turn to the proof. Remember, there is a big difference between understanding a proof in the text and constructing one yourself. ... Begin by skimming through the proof to get a general idea of its outline before worrying about the details in each step. It's easier to understand an argument if you know approximately where it's headed. Then go back to the beginning of the proof and read it carefully, line by line. If it says "such-and-such is true by theorem 5.18," go back and check to see just what Theorem 5.18 says and make sure you understand why it applies here. When you get stuck, take that part on faith and finish the proof. If you still get stuck after that, ask a professor.

The bold emphasis in the above quote was added by me because I believe it is extremely important to one's success as a mathematics major. Following Hungerford's advice with diligence and patience with yourself will work wonders. Everyone struggles at some point; how you respond is extremely important to your success, or failure. Best of luck to you! :smile:
 
Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...

Similar threads

Replies
32
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Back
Top