Calculating Potential in a Conducting Sphere and Wire Configuration

  • Thread starter Thread starter kyryk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Potential
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the electric potential in a system with a conducting sphere and a radially positioned conducting wire. The original poster expresses uncertainty about their solution to the problem, which involves a sphere of radius R at potential V and a wire extending from R1 to R2, both greater than R. Other participants suggest that the question resembles a homework problem and encourage the poster to share their attempted solution for critique. There is speculation about the wire potentially introducing a singularity that complicates the solution, indicating that standard methods may not apply. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the need for clarity in solving this unique electrostatics problem.
kyryk
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I am trying to solve the following problem:

Consider the configuration of a conducting sphere of radius R held at potential V, and a conducting wire radially positioned with respect to the sphere with one end at R1>R, and the other end at R2>R1. What is the potential everywhere?

I chalked down a quick solution but I don't believe my answer. Any help would be appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kyryk said:
I am trying to solve the following problem:

Consider the configuration of a conducting sphere of radius R held at potential V, and a conducting wire radially positioned with respect to the sphere with one end at R1>R, and the other end at R2>R1. What is the potential everywhere?

I chalked down a quick solution but I don't believe my answer. Any help would be appreciated!

This certainly seems like a homework-type question (even if it is not actual homework), so I think you should get a mod to move it to the homework subforums and post your attempt at a solution.
 
Not a homework question. As a matter of fact, never seen such type of E&M questions in standard books. I suspect that the wire presents some sort of singularity in the solution that is a bit tricky to handle, at least I can't see a standard solution applying here. However, if I'm wrong and there is a trivial solution, even better if this is indeed a homework question somewhere, I'd like a link or something of the sort.
 
kyryk said:
Not a homework question. As a matter of fact, never seen such type of E&M questions in standard books. I suspect that the wire presents some sort of singularity in the solution that is a bit tricky to handle, at least I can't see a standard solution applying here. However, if I'm wrong and there is a trivial solution, even better if this is indeed a homework question somewhere, I'd like a link or something of the sort.

Still seems like a homework-type question to me. In any case, you said in your first post that you "chalked down a quick solution" but aren't confident in your answer - why not post that solution (or the main points of it) so we can critique it?
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top