What education meant in the 1900's

  • Thread starter Thread starter jaydnul
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Education
AI Thread Summary
Einstein graduated in 1901 with a teaching certificate in physics, which is comparable to a modern bachelor's degree but reflects a different educational context. At that time, university lecturers did not necessarily need a PhD, though professors typically held one. Einstein initially aimed to be a lecturer but struggled to find a position, leading him to work at a patent office. During this time, he wrote a doctoral thesis independently, which he submitted to the University of Zurich, earning his PhD in 1905. This year was pivotal for him, marked by significant publications, including his work on special relativity. His doctoral thesis focused on molecular dimensions, a topic that has had practical applications in various industries. Overall, the qualifications for teaching at universities were less stringent in Einstein's era compared to today's requirements for PhD holders.
jaydnul
Messages
558
Reaction score
15
So i was reading Einstein's bio and it said that he graduated from a college when he was 21 with a degree in physics which sounds like a bachelors, but was it considered a bachelors degree or was it something different back then? Also, he became a professor at many universities, which nowadays is reserved for PhD holders exclusively. Were PhD's offered during that time, or was Einstein's 4 year education the equivalent of a PhD nowadays?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
And i know that it is Albert Einstein and he was already on the scene when he was offered the professorships, but in general, were the qualifications lower to teach at a university back then?
 
The degree Einstein received in 1901 was actually a teaching certificate in physics, something that would qualify someone to teach as a university lecturer. Such things don't really exist these days (at least, not in the English-speaking world) since, as you say, a PhD is generally a prerequisite to be a university lecturer now. However, professors—those who both taught and did research—still held PhDs then, as they do now. Einstein's original ambition was just to be a lecturer. As a physics qualification, it appears his 1901 certificate was comparable to a modern bachelor's degree. That is, comparable in an abstract sense, the actual content would have been rather different—as much of what contemporary students study past their first year hadn't been discovered yet (in many cases by Einstein).

However, Einstein did later complete a PhD, though in a somewhat unconventional manner. He was unsuccessful at finding work as a university lecturer so he took a job at a patent office. In his spare time, he worked on physics and wrote a doctoral thesis without being affiliated with a university. He submitted it the University of Zurich for consideration and they awarded him a PhD in 1905. That was also Einstein's so-called "miracle year" of multiple ground-breaking publications (including special relativity) and within a few years he was offered a professorship.
 
LastOneStanding said:
However, Einstein did later complete a PhD, though in a somewhat unconventional manner. He was unsuccessful at finding work as a university lecturer so he took a job at a patent office. In his spare time, he worked on physics and wrote a doctoral thesis without being affiliated with a university. He submitted it the University of Zurich for consideration and they awarded him a PhD in 1905. That was also Einstein's so-called "miracle year" of multiple ground-breaking publications (including special relativity) and within a few years he was offered a professorship.

Indeed, however, it is of minor historical interest to recall that his thesis in April 1905 was not for his studies of quantum phenomena or relativity but was entitled "A new determination of molecular dimensions." The paper was one of Einstein's most cited and has been applied in fields such as cement mixing, dairy production, and aerosols.

More information can surely be found by the enterprising google user.
 
Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I'm going to make this one quick since I have little time. Background: Throughout my life I have always done good in Math. I almost always received 90%+, and received easily upwards of 95% when I took normal-level HS Math courses. When I took Grade 9 "De-Streamed" Math (All students must take "De-Streamed" in Canada), I initially had 98% until I got very sick and my mark had dropped to 95%. The Physics teachers and Math teachers talked about me as if I were some sort of genius. Then, an...
Back
Top