Is there any known theorem about this?

  • Thread starter Thread starter JK423
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theorem
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between the mean values <S> and <S'> derived from a two-valued probability distribution after randomly erasing M results from N trials. It highlights that while the theoretical means are equal regardless of sample size, the sample means can differ, especially with finite N and M. The law of large numbers is mentioned, indicating that as N approaches infinity, the sample mean converges to the theoretical mean. Participants seek a theorem applicable to finite samples that ensures <S'> can closely approximate <S>. The conversation emphasizes the distinction between theoretical and sample means in statistical analysis.
JK423
Gold Member
Messages
394
Reaction score
7
Suppose that you have a probability distribution P of a parameter which, for simplicity, it is two-valued. For example, it could be a coin where we denote heads with "+" and tails with "-". Suppose that we throw the coin N times, and the results tend to follow the probability ditribution P for large enough N (which naturally could be 50%-50%).
We then calculate the mean value of all these results, which are a series of "+" and "-" (N in total), and find a number <S>.
Suppose now, that, we erase M of these results (with M<N) from the total N, and we are left with the rest N-M results. BUT, we do the erasure with a completely random way. We calculate, again, the mean value with the N-M results, <S'>.

QUESTION
Will the mean values <S> and <S'> be equal?

The answer will surely depend on the numbers N, M. Is there any known theorem about this, that guarantees the equality for appropriate N, M?

Edit: For finite N, M ofcourse the equality is impossible. What i mean is whether <S'> can approach <S> very very close, for appropriate N, M.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Is your question about the sample mean or the theoretical mean? For the sample means, they could be different. For the theoretical means, they are equal.
 
Hmm, what is the difference? Perhaps, you mean that the sample mean includes a finite N while the theoretical an infinite N?

I am looking for a theorem on sample mean with finite N, so that it's applicable in real applications..
I am glad that the theoretical means are equal though :). Is there any proof of this to your knowledge?
 
The theoretical mean is determined from the probability distribution. It has nothing to do with sample size. There is a theorem (law of large numbers) which states (under the proper conditions) that the sample mean -> theoretical mean as N becomes infinite.

I don't know what kind of theorem you are looking for. Perhaps the following may help.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sampling_(statistics )
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I was reading documentation about the soundness and completeness of logic formal systems. Consider the following $$\vdash_S \phi$$ where ##S## is the proof-system making part the formal system and ##\phi## is a wff (well formed formula) of the formal language. Note the blank on left of the turnstile symbol ##\vdash_S##, as far as I can tell it actually represents the empty set. So what does it mean ? I guess it actually means ##\phi## is a theorem of the formal system, i.e. there is a...
Back
Top