Tesla Wardenclyffe experiment, researching

  • Thread starter Thread starter RBurnside99
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Experiment Tesla
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the feasibility of the Tesla Wardenclyffe experiment and the potential to replicate it. Concerns are raised about the legitimacy of fundraising efforts associated with the project, especially when it promises extraordinary results. Participants express skepticism regarding the practicality of Tesla's original concepts, noting that modern physics contradicts his ideas about wireless energy transmission. There is also interest in exploring the historical significance of the Wardenclyffe tower and the possibility of constructing a smaller-scale version for experimental purposes. Ultimately, the conversation highlights a mix of intrigue and caution regarding Tesla's legacy and the project's viability.
RBurnside99
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Sorry, maybe not the best place for this but I need some guidance, so first, here's the link

[link deleted]

and here's the situation: For obvious reasons I'd be very interested in seeing this become a reality, but having no idea of the principles involved I couldn't even begin to understand whether they're on the up or not (though the 40k might be proof enough). This would all be a null point if it was just myself, as I would donate what I could and leave it at that, however, through my partner's family I may be able to involve some fairly influential/wealthy individuals, so, assuming this is legit, what I'm asking is this, how would one go about selling this project to an individual who was at one time in the top 500 wealthiest people in the UK?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Sorry, but that link is soliciting money. It's deleted.

As a general principle, if someone a) promises something that seems too good to be true, b) involes the spirit of Nikola Tesla, and c) asks for money, you should hold on to your wallet.
 
But what about the actual Wardenclyffe tower and experiment? Could someone attempt to try and build a copy of the device just to see what it could've done? That is, disregarding the questionable website. I don't expect miracles, but might not it be an interesting thing to do? Even build a smaller-scale copy?
 
sshai45 said:
But what about the actual Wardenclyffe tower and experiment? Could someone attempt to try and build a copy of the device just to see what it could've done? That is, disregarding the questionable website. I don't expect miracles, but might not it be an interesting thing to do? Even build a smaller-scale copy?

Using the Earth and sky for conduction and the induction of large amounts of electrical energy for practical uses over large distances is just impossible the way Tesla imagined. Tesla had no idea of the true physics of electromagnetic energy (radio/EM waves) and called those who did clowns and meta-physicists.
http://earlyradiohistory.us/1919tru.htm
The Hertz wave theory of wireless transmission may be kept up for a while, but I do not hesitate to say that in a short time it will be recognized as one of the most remarkable and inexplicable aberrations of the scientific mind which has ever been recorded in history.
 
Last edited:
I'm working through something and want to make sure I understand the physics. In a system with three wave components at 120° phase separation, the total energy calculation depends on how we treat them: If coherent (add amplitudes first, then square): E = (A₁ + A₂ + A₃)² = 0 If independent (square each, then add): E = A₁² + A₂² + A₃² = 3/2 = constant In three-phase electrical systems, we treat the phases as independent — total power is sum of individual powers. In light interference...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K