Tesla Wardenclyffe experiment, researching

  • Thread starter Thread starter RBurnside99
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Experiment Tesla
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the Tesla Wardenclyffe experiment, exploring the feasibility of recreating the device and its potential applications. Participants express varying levels of skepticism and curiosity regarding the project's legitimacy and the underlying principles of Tesla's ideas.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses interest in the Wardenclyffe project and seeks guidance on how to present it to potential investors, indicating a desire to understand the principles involved.
  • Another participant warns against the project, suggesting that it may be a scam based on the promise of extraordinary results and the solicitation of funds.
  • Some participants propose the idea of attempting to build a replica of the Wardenclyffe tower to investigate its capabilities, despite acknowledging the questionable nature of the original project.
  • Concerns are raised about the feasibility of Tesla's original vision, with one participant arguing that Tesla's understanding of electromagnetic energy was flawed and that the principles he proposed may not hold true according to modern physics.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus; there are competing views regarding the legitimacy of the project and the practicality of recreating Tesla's experiments. Some express skepticism about the original ideas, while others are curious about exploring them further.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the need for critical evaluation of the project's claims and the historical context of Tesla's theories, suggesting that assumptions about the feasibility of large-scale wireless energy transmission may be overly optimistic.

RBurnside99
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Sorry, maybe not the best place for this but I need some guidance, so first, here's the link

[link deleted]

and here's the situation: For obvious reasons I'd be very interested in seeing this become a reality, but having no idea of the principles involved I couldn't even begin to understand whether they're on the up or not (though the 40k might be proof enough). This would all be a null point if it was just myself, as I would donate what I could and leave it at that, however, through my partner's family I may be able to involve some fairly influential/wealthy individuals, so, assuming this is legit, what I'm asking is this, how would one go about selling this project to an individual who was at one time in the top 500 wealthiest people in the UK?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Sorry, but that link is soliciting money. It's deleted.

As a general principle, if someone a) promises something that seems too good to be true, b) involes the spirit of Nikola Tesla, and c) asks for money, you should hold on to your wallet.
 
But what about the actual Wardenclyffe tower and experiment? Could someone attempt to try and build a copy of the device just to see what it could've done? That is, disregarding the questionable website. I don't expect miracles, but might not it be an interesting thing to do? Even build a smaller-scale copy?
 
sshai45 said:
But what about the actual Wardenclyffe tower and experiment? Could someone attempt to try and build a copy of the device just to see what it could've done? That is, disregarding the questionable website. I don't expect miracles, but might not it be an interesting thing to do? Even build a smaller-scale copy?

Using the Earth and sky for conduction and the induction of large amounts of electrical energy for practical uses over large distances is just impossible the way Tesla imagined. Tesla had no idea of the true physics of electromagnetic energy (radio/EM waves) and called those who did clowns and meta-physicists.
http://earlyradiohistory.us/1919tru.htm
The Hertz wave theory of wireless transmission may be kept up for a while, but I do not hesitate to say that in a short time it will be recognized as one of the most remarkable and inexplicable aberrations of the scientific mind which has ever been recorded in history.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
9K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K