Life on a brown dwarf or a fissioning rouge planet?

Click For Summary
Life on a brown dwarf is considered unlikely due to the scarcity of solvents and the predominance of hydrogen and helium, making the formation of a rocky core improbable. However, if life is defined as replicating chemical structures, there may be potential for such processes to occur in a suitable atmosphere. In contrast, a rogue planet with sufficient internal heat could create environments similar to those found in Earth's deep crust or volcanic vents, potentially supporting life. The discussion highlights the distinction between the emergence of life and its sustainability in extreme conditions. Overall, the feasibility of life on these celestial bodies remains a complex and debated topic.
Loren Booda
Messages
3,108
Reaction score
4
Life on a brown dwarf or a fissioning rogue planet?

Is life on a brown dwarf or a rogue planet with a fissioning core any less feasible than life in a solar system?
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Loren Booda said:
Is life on a brown dwarf or a rogue planet with a fissioning core any less feasible than life in a solar system?


On a brown dwarf, which would be very likely a gas giant, the lack of solvents makes life unlikely (barring some sort of giant rocky core with a vast extended atmosphere, but the composition of interstellar clouds makes such a formation unlikely. There is far far more hydrogen and helium than anything else so forming a rocky brown dwarf seems unlikely (not impossible I suppose, but exceedingly rare). Although, if you define life as merely replicating chemical structures (like DNA or RNA), governed by the rule of natural selection and evolution (though this is somewhat putting the cart before the horse if one defines lifeforms as things that evolve) it might be possible for such reactions to be carried out in an atmosphere. I don't know though.

A rogue planet that provides enough heat internally could support life, it wouldn't be all that different from the environments found deep in the Earth's crust, or volcanic ocean vents I imagine. Whether life could arise in such conditions might be a different issue from whether or not it can be supported though.
 
You can't imagine how disappointed I was, to open this thread and find out that "rouge planet" was just a typo.
 
  • Like
Likes Steelwolf
"Pop III stars are thought to be composed entirely of helium and hydrogen with trace amounts of lithium, the ingredients left over after the Big Bang. They formed early on, around 200 million years after the universe began. These stars are extremely rare because they died out long ago, although scientists have hoped that the faint light from these distant, ancient objects would be detectable. Previous Population III candidates have been ruled out because they didn't meet the three main...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
31
Views
6K
Replies
5
Views
2K