Life on a brown dwarf or a fissioning rouge planet?

AI Thread Summary
Life on a brown dwarf is considered unlikely due to the scarcity of solvents and the predominance of hydrogen and helium, making the formation of a rocky core improbable. However, if life is defined as replicating chemical structures, there may be potential for such processes to occur in a suitable atmosphere. In contrast, a rogue planet with sufficient internal heat could create environments similar to those found in Earth's deep crust or volcanic vents, potentially supporting life. The discussion highlights the distinction between the emergence of life and its sustainability in extreme conditions. Overall, the feasibility of life on these celestial bodies remains a complex and debated topic.
Loren Booda
Messages
3,108
Reaction score
4
Life on a brown dwarf or a fissioning rogue planet?

Is life on a brown dwarf or a rogue planet with a fissioning core any less feasible than life in a solar system?
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Loren Booda said:
Is life on a brown dwarf or a rogue planet with a fissioning core any less feasible than life in a solar system?


On a brown dwarf, which would be very likely a gas giant, the lack of solvents makes life unlikely (barring some sort of giant rocky core with a vast extended atmosphere, but the composition of interstellar clouds makes such a formation unlikely. There is far far more hydrogen and helium than anything else so forming a rocky brown dwarf seems unlikely (not impossible I suppose, but exceedingly rare). Although, if you define life as merely replicating chemical structures (like DNA or RNA), governed by the rule of natural selection and evolution (though this is somewhat putting the cart before the horse if one defines lifeforms as things that evolve) it might be possible for such reactions to be carried out in an atmosphere. I don't know though.

A rogue planet that provides enough heat internally could support life, it wouldn't be all that different from the environments found deep in the Earth's crust, or volcanic ocean vents I imagine. Whether life could arise in such conditions might be a different issue from whether or not it can be supported though.
 
You can't imagine how disappointed I was, to open this thread and find out that "rouge planet" was just a typo.
 
  • Like
Likes Steelwolf
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top