Photon Acceleration: From 0 to c in Zero Seconds?

In summary, photons are massless and have a uniform speed of 'c' when created. Acceleration during the Planck time does not appear to make sense because photons would have mass and would not be able to be accelerated to light speed.
  • #1
PhanthomJay
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
7,199
525
I turn on my flashlight and I am told that instantly the photons travel at the speed of light, i.e., their speed reach 'c' in zero seconds. Infinite acceleration? Doesn't seem right. Could something be happening during the Planck time that provides some acceleration during that brief period?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Acceleration? What, you're claiming the photons started with zero speed?
 
  • #3
Photons are massless so the idea of acceleration as in f=ma is not applicable. Also I doubt if anyone actually believes they are created in 0 time. Applying classical concepts to photons is not useful as has been discussed in many threads in PF.
 
  • #4
Mentz114 said:
Photons are massless so the idea of acceleration as in f=ma is not applicable. Also I doubt if anyone actually believes they are created in 0 time. Applying classical concepts to photons is not useful as has been discussed in many threads in PF.
Let me rephrase the question. I'm not a regular on this forum, so I'm not sure of what may have been previously discussed on this topic. If photon's are not created instantly, are they created within the Planck time, and is their speed instantaneously 'c' at the moment of their creation?
 
  • #5
As I've said elsewhere in the forums, photons are a *model*. They have certain properties, and behave in a certain way. Unfortunately, their role in the grander model of quantum electrodynamics means that they don't behave like little billiard balls. For one thing, their speed is c, always, and cannot be changed. The specific details of creation (i.e. whether it even makes sense to talk about a "moment" that a specific photon is created) simply do not exist in this model.
 
  • #6
PhantomJay, for a non-regular you have a lot of posts. As genneth says, the models we have don't tell us what you want to know. But a photon is not a photon unless it travels at c. Therefore all photons have always had that velocity. Perhaps you are proposing that there is something that becomes a photon by acceleration. That cannot happen because the thing would have mass and nothing massy can be accelerated to light speed.
 
  • #7
Photons can be counted, so you'd think that the number of photons in your flashlight is an integer, and that a graph of the number of photons in your flashlight must go up in jumps.

However, quantum mechanics is not quite that simple.

While photons can be counted, you are not guaranteed to have an integer number of them unless you actually do count them. (Formally, you have an integer number when the field is in an eigenstate of the counting operator. I'm not quite sure exactly how the counting operator works, actually, but every quantum measurement must be associated with an operator by the formalism ).

If you don't count them, then it's perfectly possible for there to be a non-integer number of photons in your flashlight (on the average, this is called an expectation value). This is because the electromagnetic fields in your flashlight could be in a a "quantum superposition" of states. This is one of those weird quantum phenomenom that really don't have any good classical analogue.

Given this possibility, though, there's no need for the graph of photon number vs time to go up in jumps.

The fact that photons don't have a number unless you count them is similar to the way they don't have a position unless you measure it, and they don't have a momentum unless you measure that. And when you measure the position, you affect the momentum, and vica-versa.

On a practical level, one photon more or less isn't going to be measuarble anyway. So you're better off thinking of your flashlight classically, unless you design your flashlight so that it only emits a few photons.
 
  • #9
Thanks all for the responses. The 'photon bag' story summed it up quite nicely! Thanks.
 

1. What is photon acceleration?

Photon acceleration is the process of increasing the speed of a photon, which is a particle of light, to the speed of light (c) in a vacuum. This is achieved by passing the photon through a medium with a varying refractive index, which causes the photon to accelerate due to the change in the speed of light through the medium.

2. How fast can a photon be accelerated?

In theory, a photon can be accelerated to the speed of light (c) in a vacuum, which is approximately 300 million meters per second. However, in practice, achieving such high speeds is currently not possible due to limitations in technology and the laws of physics.

3. What are the potential applications of photon acceleration?

Photon acceleration has potential applications in fields such as particle physics, astrophysics, and materials science. It can be used to study the properties of particles at high energies, simulate extreme conditions in the universe, and create new materials with unique properties.

4. Is photon acceleration the same as time travel?

No, photon acceleration does not involve time travel. While it may seem like the photon is traveling faster than the speed of light, it is actually the medium that is being manipulated to make it appear that way. The photon still follows the laws of physics and does not violate the principle of causality.

5. Are there any ethical concerns surrounding photon acceleration?

As with any scientific advancement, there may be ethical concerns surrounding the use of photon acceleration. For example, the high energies involved in the process could have potential safety risks and the creation of new materials with unique properties could have unintended consequences. It is important for scientists to carefully consider the potential risks and benefits before conducting research in this field.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
55
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
45
Views
3K
Replies
32
Views
902
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
36
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
29
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
27
Views
4K
Back
Top