Photon Acceleration: From 0 to c in Zero Seconds?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter PhanthomJay
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Acceleration Photon
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the nature of photon acceleration, specifically questioning whether photons can be said to accelerate from zero speed to the speed of light (c) instantaneously upon creation. Participants explore concepts related to the creation of photons, their properties as massless particles, and the implications of quantum mechanics on counting and measuring photons.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question the idea that photons start with zero speed, suggesting that this notion implies infinite acceleration.
  • Others argue that since photons are massless, the classical concept of acceleration (f=ma) does not apply, and the creation of photons cannot be described using classical mechanics.
  • A participant rephrases the question to inquire whether photons are created within the Planck time and if their speed is instantaneously c at creation.
  • One participant emphasizes that photons are a model with specific properties and that their behavior does not conform to classical analogies, noting that the concept of a "moment" of creation may not be meaningful in the context of quantum electrodynamics.
  • Another participant asserts that all photons must travel at c and cannot be created through acceleration, as this would imply mass, which contradicts the nature of photons.
  • A discussion on the counting of photons reveals that while photons can be counted, the number may not always be an integer unless measured, due to quantum superposition effects.
  • One participant highlights that the graph of photon number versus time does not necessarily need to increase in discrete jumps, reflecting the complexities of quantum measurement.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of photon creation and acceleration, with no consensus reached on whether photons can be said to accelerate or if they are created instantaneously at speed c. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of quantum mechanics on these concepts.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on classical versus quantum interpretations of photon behavior, and the unresolved nature of how to conceptualize photon creation within the framework of quantum mechanics.

PhanthomJay
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Messages
7,201
Reaction score
527
I turn on my flashlight and I am told that instantly the photons travel at the speed of light, i.e., their speed reach 'c' in zero seconds. Infinite acceleration? Doesn't seem right. Could something be happening during the Planck time that provides some acceleration during that brief period?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Acceleration? What, you're claiming the photons started with zero speed?
 
Photons are massless so the idea of acceleration as in f=ma is not applicable. Also I doubt if anyone actually believes they are created in 0 time. Applying classical concepts to photons is not useful as has been discussed in many threads in PF.
 
Mentz114 said:
Photons are massless so the idea of acceleration as in f=ma is not applicable. Also I doubt if anyone actually believes they are created in 0 time. Applying classical concepts to photons is not useful as has been discussed in many threads in PF.
Let me rephrase the question. I'm not a regular on this forum, so I'm not sure of what may have been previously discussed on this topic. If photon's are not created instantly, are they created within the Planck time, and is their speed instantaneously 'c' at the moment of their creation?
 
As I've said elsewhere in the forums, photons are a *model*. They have certain properties, and behave in a certain way. Unfortunately, their role in the grander model of quantum electrodynamics means that they don't behave like little billiard balls. For one thing, their speed is c, always, and cannot be changed. The specific details of creation (i.e. whether it even makes sense to talk about a "moment" that a specific photon is created) simply do not exist in this model.
 
PhantomJay, for a non-regular you have a lot of posts. As genneth says, the models we have don't tell us what you want to know. But a photon is not a photon unless it travels at c. Therefore all photons have always had that velocity. Perhaps you are proposing that there is something that becomes a photon by acceleration. That cannot happen because the thing would have mass and nothing massy can be accelerated to light speed.
 
Photons can be counted, so you'd think that the number of photons in your flashlight is an integer, and that a graph of the number of photons in your flashlight must go up in jumps.

However, quantum mechanics is not quite that simple.

While photons can be counted, you are not guaranteed to have an integer number of them unless you actually do count them. (Formally, you have an integer number when the field is in an eigenstate of the counting operator. I'm not quite sure exactly how the counting operator works, actually, but every quantum measurement must be associated with an operator by the formalism ).

If you don't count them, then it's perfectly possible for there to be a non-integer number of photons in your flashlight (on the average, this is called an expectation value). This is because the electromagnetic fields in your flashlight could be in a a "quantum superposition" of states. This is one of those weird quantum phenomenom that really don't have any good classical analogue.

Given this possibility, though, there's no need for the graph of photon number vs time to go up in jumps.

The fact that photons don't have a number unless you count them is similar to the way they don't have a position unless you measure it, and they don't have a momentum unless you measure that. And when you measure the position, you affect the momentum, and vica-versa.

On a practical level, one photon more or less isn't going to be measuarble anyway. So you're better off thinking of your flashlight classically, unless you design your flashlight so that it only emits a few photons.
 
Thanks all for the responses. The 'photon bag' story summed it up quite nicely! Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K