Differential Equation with Vector Product

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a differential equation describing the motion of a charged particle in an arbitrary magnetic field. Participants are tasked with proving that the speed of the particle remains constant despite the field's variability.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of the equation, questioning whether the magnetic field is variable or constant. Some suggest that constant speed indicates acceleration is only changing direction, while others discuss the relevance of vector products and dot products in the context of the differential equation.

Discussion Status

Several participants have offered hints and suggestions for approaching the problem, particularly regarding the use of derivatives and vector analysis. There is an acknowledgment of the complexity introduced by the vector product, and some participants express confusion about how to apply these concepts effectively.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem states the magnetic field is "arbitrary," leading to uncertainty about its nature. There is also mention of previous discussions on similar topics, indicating a broader context for the inquiry.

debis
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
If a particle with charge e and mass m is in an arbitrary magnetic field has motion described by:

m\frac{d^2\vec{r}}{dt^2}=\frac{e}{c}\frac{d\vec{r}}{dt}\times\vec{H}

prove that the speed v\equiv\left\vert\frac{d\vec{r}}{dt}\right\vert is constant.

I don't understand how to do this when the field isn't necessarily constant.
Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Vector Product Differential Equation

If a particle with charge e and mass m is in an arbitrary magnetic field has motion described by:

m\frac{d^2\vec{r}}{dt^2}=\frac{e}{c}\frac{d\vec{r} }{dt}\times\vec{H}

prove that the speed v\equiv\left\vert\frac{d\vec{r}}{dt}\right\vert is constant.

I don't understand how to do this when the field isn't necessarily constant.
Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!

i posted this elsewhere here but after browsing the site i thought this was a more appropriate place to put it...
 


Does it specify a variable or constant field?

The fact that the speed is constant means that any acceleration is involved in changing the direction rather than tangential velocity.
 


Astronuc said:
Does it specify a variable or constant field?

The fact that the speed is constant means that any acceleration is involved in changing the direction rather than tangential velocity.

it just says arbitrary, so I'm assuming it means it could be variable or constant (it's definitely not reliably constant because the next question is "assuming the field is a constant")

i tried using circular motion with it for the constant speed, but i didn't understand how to apply it using vector products in differential equations.
 


I would start by finding

\frac {d}{dt} \left| \frac{d \vec r}{dt} \right|

Then you should be able to show, from your available equations, that the above expression is zero.

Note that in general, the vector v x H is always perpendicular to v. This should be enough to prove what you want.
 
what happens if you take the dot product with dr/dt?
to the right side? (should get 0).
to the left side? (do you recognize a complete derivative?)
 
qbert said:
what happens if you take the dot product with dr/dt?
to the right side? (should get 0).
to the left side? (do you recognize a complete derivative?)
I don't see how that helps, don't you get 0 on the left hand side as well since a vector and its derivative are perpendicular?
 
A vector and its derivative are NOT necessarily perpendicular. That is true only if the vector has constant length- which is what you are trying to prove.
 
  • #10
i tried to find \frac{d}{dt}\left\vert\frac{d\vec{r}}{dt}\right\vert but i don't know how to handle a diff eq with a vector product in it - i understand in theory how proving all the above mentioned things would work, my main question was how to handle a cross product in a differential equation... i looked in all my textbooks and on all sorts of websites and nothing helped.
 
  • #11
For the question in the original post, qbert (post #6) has given, in my opinion, the best hints.
 
  • #12
ah yes, i got it.
i was so caught up in the diff eq part of it i forgot about simple vecor analysis. i always make things more complicated than they are :/
thank you so much everyone for your help, particularly qbert, your hint really helped :)
 
Last edited:
  • #13
Here you can find the answer of your question
http://www.iop.org/EJ/abstract/0953-4075/42/5/055504/
this Is Stimulated Raman adiabatic passage analogues in classical physics
or here in the arxiv
http://arxiv.org/abs/0812.0361
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K