Magnetic Field & π: Uncovering the Mystery

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the constant μ0 in Maxwell's equations, specifically its value of 4π × 10^-7 N/A². This constant serves as a conversion factor between tesla and amp-turns per meter, and its unique value arises from the SI unit system, where the factor of 4π is integral to the relationship between magnetic field strength and flux. The presence of π is attributed to the geometric properties of spheres, as magnetic fields spread over a surface area proportional to 4πr². Participants clarify that while μ0 is a constant, it is not directly related to environmental properties, unlike the permeability of specific materials. The discussion highlights the mathematical and historical context behind the constant's value in physics.
Amir H.Saba
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi
as you know according to ampere's law ∫B.dl=μ0I
but why μ0 that appears in Maxwell's equations is exactly 4π *10-7 ?
for example in electric field ε0 is 8.85 *10-12
and μ0 like ε0 is a constant that is related to material properties and why this constant is a special number as π that B is special ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi Amir! Welcome to PF! :smile:

From the PF Library on magnetic field …​

What is µ0?

µo is the conversion factor between tesla (T\ =\ N/A.m) and amp-turns per metre (A/m): so it has units of N/A^2.

Why isn't µo = 1 N/A2 (so that it needn't be mentioned)? :confused:

well, it would be :smile:, buuuut :rolleyes:

i] in SI units, a factor of 4π keeps cropping up! … so we multiply by 4π :wink:

ii] that would make the amp that current which in a pair of wires a metre apart would produce a force between them of 2 N/m …

which would make most electrical appliances run on micro-amps!

so, for practical convenience only, we make µo 107 smaller, and the amp 107 larger! :biggrin:

(so the amp is that current which in a pair of wires a metre apart would produce a force between them of 2 10-7 N/m, and µo is 4π 10-7 N/A2 (= 4π 10-7 H/m))

(for historical details, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_constant)


(And the electric constant (permittivity of free space), \varepsilon_o, is defined as 1/µ0c², = 107/4πc² C²/Nm² (or F/m).)
 
yes, your sentences is true ,but my query is that π is a number that related to sphere.but µo is a constant that related to environment.and why is a special number that has π ?
µo is exactly 4π 10^-7 but if it is a constant about environment , why it is exactly a special number ? I think it should related to microscopic vacuum properties ,if isn't it ,why for other environments µ is not 4π *10^-7 ? and is a other number? but for free space is a special number like π !
sorry for my english is not good.
 
Amir H.Saba said:
yes, your sentences is true ,but my query is that π is a number that related to sphere.but µo is a constant that related to environment.and why is a special number that has π ?

No, µo is not related to the environment.

µo is simply the conversion factor between tesla and amp-turns per metre.

(of course, µ (for a material) is related to the material)

The 4π is a standard factor in SI units, since it naturally relates the strength of a source to its flux (because the field from the source spread out over an area 4πr2 instead of r2).
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top