Determine nitrogen content in lawn fertiliser using volumetric analysis

  • Thread starter Thread starter Malinn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Analysis Nitrogen
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining nitrogen content in lawn fertilizer through a back titration method. The participant conducted an experiment and questioned the accuracy of their equations and calculations related to the titration of excess hydroxide ions with hydrochloric acid. Clarifications were provided regarding the correct use of average titre values and the proper stoichiometric equations for the reactions involved. The participant aimed to calculate the moles of HCl used to ultimately determine the moles of nitrogen present in the fertilizer. The conversation highlights the importance of accurate calculations and the correct interpretation of chemical equations in volumetric analysis.
Malinn
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I undertook a practical experiment where a back titration was used to determine the amount of nitrogen in fertiliser.My titres are 3.9, 3.7 and 4.2 So I know this reaction occurred:
NH4+ + OH- ---> NH3 +H2O
I then boiled the solution to expel the Ammonia and the excess OH- ions were titrated against 0.1 M HCl.

OH- +HCl ---> Cl- +H2O
Is this equation correct? If so are the following calculations correct too?
n (HCl)= 0.1 x 0.0039
n(HVl)=0.0039


If this calculation is correct, what do I have to do next?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Malinn said:
OH- +HCl ---> Cl- +H2O
Is this equation correct?

Yes and no. Yes, it will give the correct result, no there is no HCl in solution. It is completely dissociated to H+ and Cl-.

If so are the following calculations correct too?
n (HCl)= 0.1 x 0.0039
n(HVl)=0.0039

Sorry, but neither makes sense to me. I can only guess in the first you are trying to calculate number of moles of HCl, I can only guess 0.1 is molarity of the acid used, but I don't understand what is 0.0039. You should use average volume, but 0.0039 is not the average of volumes you listed. And I can't even guess what you mean by n(HVl)=0.0039, unless you made a typo and math error in one line.

If this calculation is correct, what do I have to do next?

http://www.titrations.info/back-titration
 
I was attempting to calculate the amount of mol of HCl was used and then using the mol ratio from the equation, calculate how many mole of nitrogen was present. The molarity of the HCl used was 0.1M and I was supposed to multiply it by 0.003933 (as this is the average of the titres) to find the mol (as the formula states n= concentration x volume (in litres)).

By doing this I hoped to find the mol of HCl used which is what was meant by n(HVl)=0.0039
the (HVl) was a typo for (HCl)

So what is the proper equation? Would this work in its place?
NaOH +HCl ---> NaCl +H2O

Sorry about the mistakes.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top