Order of operations - parenetheses

  • Thread starter Thread starter manjuvenamma
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Operations
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores alternatives to parentheses for indicating the order of operations in mathematical expressions, questioning their effectiveness. While parentheses are widely used, some participants express curiosity about other methods, such as prefix and postfix notation, which are utilized in programming. Historical perspectives reveal that various types of brackets were once studied, but modern usage has simplified to standard parentheses. The conversation reflects a blend of nostalgia and interest in mathematical notation evolution. Overall, the topic invites consideration of whether more efficient methods exist beyond traditional parentheses.
manjuvenamma
Messages
102
Reaction score
0
Is there a better/different way of indicating the order of operations in a mathematical expression - other than using parentheses?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Why? What's wrong with parentheses?
 
Ah, prefix and postfix notation. I remember when I took an intro to programming class as an undergrad, I had to write a program that converted from prefix/postfix to infix, in Pascal. That was fun. :biggrin:
 
Number Nine! Nothing wrong with brackets. Just curiosity. When I studied OOO when I was kid 40 years ago, I studied different types of brackets and their order of precedence. Now, no one uses all these types of brackets, just ordinary brackets with nesting as needed.

Just curiosity to know if there is an alternate and better way.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top