Can use Carbon to create Diode

  • Thread starter Thread starter baby_1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Carbon Diode
AI Thread Summary
Carbon can theoretically be used to create diodes, but challenges such as the difficulty in growing large, high-quality single crystal diamonds and finding effective n-type dopants hinder its practical application. Currently, silicon and germanium are preferred materials due to their superior properties and cost-effectiveness, with silicon offering better performance at higher temperatures. While carbon nano-materials show potential as semiconductors, their high cost limits their use in electronics at present. Historical uses of carbon in diode applications, like in crystal radios, highlight its past relevance but do not translate to modern efficiency. Ongoing research into diamond electronics suggests a future where carbon could replace silicon, but significant hurdles remain.
baby_1
Messages
159
Reaction score
16
Hello
Can use Carbon to create Diode instead of
Silicon-germanium ?
if yes why we don't have carbon diode? what is advantages and disadvantages?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since we need single crystal material, we're talking diamond. Historically, growing large single crystal diamonds has not been possible. If I could grow large, high-quality diamonds, I would probably focus on selling them as gems first before I would sell them to make electronics. Also, finding a good n-type dopant in diamond has been a problem (boron works well for p-type diamond, but for reasons I don't understand, the historic n-type dopants like phosphorous don't work well in diamond). However, there is a large research effort going on to make diamond electronics, and many people believe it will eventually replace silicon due to its higher thermal and electrical conductivity. Here's one recent article:

http://www.semiconductor-today.com/news_items/2012/MAY/ELEMENTSIX_230512.html
 
I think that in the past carbon in the form of coke was one of the things used as the diode detector for crystal set radios.
 
It's the question of quality. There are a number of properties you are looking for in a diode, and you just get better ones from silicone and even better from germanium.

There are some carbon nano-materials that apparently make good semiconductors. So we might start using these in the future, but right now, it's prohibitively expensive. You get best quality for the money with silicone, which is why we use it.
 
A strange comparison of silicon (silicone!) and germanium.
I understand that the advantage of silicon over germanium was it's ability to operate at higher temperatures before the onset of intrinsic conduction.
Germanium diodes have a smaller 'turn on' voltage than silicon diodes and this is an advantage when dealing with small signals.
 
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
Back
Top