Understanding Sets Defined by Specification

  • Thread starter Thread starter PhizKid
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    General Sets
AI Thread Summary
Sets defined by specification allow for the creation of subsets based on a predicate P(x) that determines membership. When P(x) is true for an element x, that element belongs to the set, while false means it does not. Examples illustrate this concept, such as the set of even natural numbers and the set of positive integers, both of which are proper subsets of their respective universes. The discussion clarifies that a set can be defined within a larger set, and the truth condition of P(x) is crucial for determining membership. Understanding these principles is essential for grasping the concept of sets in mathematics.
PhizKid
Messages
477
Reaction score
2
SETS DEFINED BY SPECIFICATION: Given a set X and a sentence P(x) that is either true or false whenever x is any particular element of X, there is a set whose elements are precisely those x ∈ X for which P(x) is true, denoted by {x ∈ X : P(x)}.

Does this mean that whenever the function P(x) is true, then x is an element of X, and when P(x) is false, then x is not an element of X?

I'm confused because the wording says that "...a sentence P(x) that is either true or false whenever x is any particular element of X..." which leads me to believe that whether P(x) is either true or false, then it is still an element of set X.

Or is it saying that there is a set within X in which P(x) is true, and there is also another set within X in which P(x) is false?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hmm, no, it's neither of these.

The set \{x\in X~\vert~P(x)\} are all the elements of X which satisfy P. So, in particular, we want all elements to lie in X.

Maybe some examples may help you to see the concept:
  • A=\{x\in \mathbb{N}~\vert~x~\text{is even}\}
    This means that we take all the elements of \mathbb{Z} which are even. So the elements of our set A are precisely 0,2,4,6,8,10,12,...
  • B=\{x\in \mathbb{Z}~\vert~x>0\}
    This is the set of all positive integers. The set consists out of 1,2,3,4,...
    Note that x=1/2 also satisfies x>0. But 1/2 does not belong to B because it doesn't satisfy x\in \mathbb{Z}.
  • C=\{x\in \mathbb{Q}~\vert~2x+2=0\}
    This is the set of all rational numbers x such that 2x+2=0. The only number satisfying that is of course -1. And this number is in \mathbb{Q}, so it belongs to C.

Does this clear up some things?
 
In those 3 examples, would A be considered a proper subset of N, B a proper subset of Z, and C a proper subset of Q?
 
PhizKid said:
In those 3 examples, would A be considered a proper subset of N, B a proper subset of Z, and C a proper subset of Q?

Yes. These are all proper subsets.

Another example would be

D=\{x\in \mathbb{N}~\vert~x\geq 0\}

So this set consists of all elements in \mathbb{N} which are larger than 0. Clearly, this is the entire set. So D is not a proper subset in this case.
 
x has to be in the universe of discourse X and pass the truth condition x is an element of P(x).
 
I was reading documentation about the soundness and completeness of logic formal systems. Consider the following $$\vdash_S \phi$$ where ##S## is the proof-system making part the formal system and ##\phi## is a wff (well formed formula) of the formal language. Note the blank on left of the turnstile symbol ##\vdash_S##, as far as I can tell it actually represents the empty set. So what does it mean ? I guess it actually means ##\phi## is a theorem of the formal system, i.e. there is a...
Back
Top