Are there non-spherical blackholes?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lino
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Blackholes
AI Thread Summary
There are four known solutions to Einstein's field equations for black holes, two of which are non-spherical: the rotating Kerr and Kerr-Newman black holes. The other two solutions, the Schwarzschild and Reissner-Nordstrom black holes, are static and spherical. Rotating black holes are confirmed to be non-spherical. The discussion emphasizes the distinction between static and rotating black holes in terms of their shape. Understanding these variations is crucial for comprehending black hole physics.
Lino
Messages
309
Reaction score
4
An amount of material I have read recently refers (specifically) to the spherical case of black holes. Are there non-spherical black holes?

Regards,

Noel.
 
Last edited:
Space news on Phys.org
There are 4 known solutions to Einstein field equations for black holes. Two of the four are rotating black holes, which are not spherical - Kerr and Kerr-Newman black holes. The other two are the Schwarzschild and Reissner-Nordstrom black holes, which are static and spherical. In each case, one variant carries no charge and the other has a charge.
 
Thanks Chronos. Can I just confirm - rotating implies non-spherical, is that correct?

Regards,

Noel.
 
Thanks Chronos.
 

Thread 'Matter density right after the decoupling'

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
View full post »

Thread 'Hubble Constant, Dark Energy and the Expanding Universe'

Why was the Hubble constant assumed to be decreasing and slowing down (decelerating) the expansion rate of the Universe, while at the same time Dark Energy is presumably accelerating the expansion? And to thicken the plot. recent news from NASA indicates that the Hubble constant is now increasing. Can you clarify this enigma? Also., if the Hubble constant eventually decreases, why is there a lower limit to its value?
View full post »

Similar threads

B Does a contracting universe destroy its black holes?
Replies
29
Views
3K
Can Black Holes Be Utilized for Practical Purposes?
Replies
9
Views
2K
I What happens when a Neutron Star forms a Black Hole?
Replies
17
Views
2K
B Question about Hawking Radiation and Iron Stars
Replies
7
Views
3K
B Questions about the Eddington Limit and Super - Eddington black holes
Replies
0
Views
2K
I Question on halos of matter made from massive and stable particles?
2
Replies
53
Views
5K
I Time Dilation at Moving Black Hole Event Horizon
Replies
16
Views
4K
Does the holographic principle remove the need for dark matter
Replies
2
Views
2K
I Cosmic Flatness Deduced from CMB
Replies
4
Views
2K
B Celestial objects in the very far future
Replies
11
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top