Taking Calculus 3 first and then Physics Electromagentism?

AI Thread Summary
Completing Calculus 1 and 2 provides a solid foundation for tackling physics, particularly electromagnetism. While some integration concepts are relevant, such as line, surface, and volume integrals, they are primarily used for conceptual understanding rather than complex mathematical applications. For a typical freshman-level electromagnetism course, prior completion of Calculus 3 is generally not necessary. However, if the course is more advanced, such as a junior or senior level using textbooks like Griffiths, a stronger calculus background may be beneficial. Students are advised to consult their instructor for specific course requirements and expectations. Overall, experiences suggest that Calculus 2 is often more directly applicable to early physics courses than Calculus 3.
Toranc3
Messages
189
Reaction score
0
I have already completed Calculus 1 and 2 but I was wondering if it would be a better idea to take calculus 3 first and then physics electromagnetism. I know that electromagnetism deals with a lot of integration but does it deal with double and triple integrals? Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If it's the second semester of a typical "freshman physics" sequence, you probably don't need Calc 3 beforehand. You will use line, surface and volume integrals, but mainly for conceptual purposes. In most examples and problems, the integrals will be trivial from a mathematical point of view. This may vary from one school to another, so if you're really worried, talk to the instructor about it beforehand.

If it's a junior/senior level E&M course using, say, Griffiths as a textbook, on the other hand...
 
jtbell said:
If it's the second semester of a typical "freshman physics" sequence, you probably don't need Calc 3 beforehand. You will use line, surface and volume integrals, but mainly for conceptual purposes. In most examples and problems, the integrals will be trivial from a mathematical point of view. This may vary from one school to another, so if you're really worried, talk to the instructor about it beforehand.

If it's a junior/senior level E&M course using, say, Griffiths as a textbook, on the other hand...

Thanks for the reply.
 
I think i took them at the same time and it didnt seem to hurt or help. I recall calc 2 being much more helpful.
 
Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
Back
Top