Explaining Newton's Cradle: Proving Conservation of Momentum & KE

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on developing a mathematical model for Newton's Cradle to demonstrate the conservation of momentum and kinetic energy. The user establishes that when two balls are released, they impart a momentum of 2mv and kinetic energy of mv², leading to the conclusion that for n balls to emerge with the same velocity, n must equal 2 for conservation to hold. The challenge arises in proving that if the velocities of the n balls are not equal, the average velocity must still satisfy the conditions of momentum and kinetic energy conservation. The user seeks assistance in demonstrating that the only viable solution for the velocities of the emerging balls results in two balls having a velocity of 2, while the others remain at zero. The inquiry highlights the complexities of proving these relationships in the context of the cradle's mechanics.
adamg
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
im working on a mathematical model of Newton's cradle. I am trying to explain mathematically why, when two balls are released, two balls pop up the other side etc.
i said that if there are N balls in the cradle, each with mass m, and the two balls you displace have gained a velocity v by the time they hit the others, initially the momentum is 2mv, and KE is mv^2. Then i said that if n balls emerged from the other side with the same velocity, it would need to equal 2v/n for conservation of momentum. Then KE is equal to (2mv^2)/n and we see KE can only be conserved when n=2.
I was just wondering if anyone can help me prove this result for when the velocity of the n balls emerging from the left is not equal. i.e then, the average velocity of the n balls would need to be 2v/n, but i don't know how to prove that n must equal 2. Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
basically, if you let v1,v2,...vn, be the velocities of the n balls that 'pop out' after the collision, therefore v1<v2<v3...<vn. From the conservation of momentum we get:

v1+v2+...vn=2v

and from the conservation of KE we get:

(v1)^2+(v2)^2+...(vn)^2= 2v^2

is there any way i can show that the only solution to this is vn=v(n-1)=2 and v1=v2=...v(n-2)=0?
 
alternatively can anyone prove that, if we have N balls, and we displace 2, 2 will 'pop out' the other side in another way? any ideas welcome! thanks
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top