Arrhenius vs. Le Chatelier battle

  • Thread starter Thread starter member 392791
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Arrhenius
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the conflicting principles of Arrhenius and Le Chatelier in the context of ammonia reactor design. High temperatures, favored by Arrhenius, increase reaction rates but can shift equilibrium unfavorably according to Le Chatelier's principle. Conversely, lower temperatures promote higher equilibrium conversion but slow down the reaction rate. This creates a challenge in optimizing conditions for maximum ammonia production. Ultimately, finding an optimal balance between these two principles is crucial for achieving the best conversion rates.
member 392791
Hello,

In my class we were talking about the design of an ammonia reactor, and there is a battle between arrhenius and le chatelier for getting the highest conversions. Apparently the two are at odds with each other as far as getting the highest conversion of ammonia.

I am confused how the two, that separately both can be used to increase the products, have incompatibilities to fully utilize both of them to get the best conversion possible.

Sorry if this sounds vague, but I figured the thought of a fight between Le chatelier and arrhenius would spark interest
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Nothing new. You want a high temperature fro the reaction to be fast, you want low temperature for the equilibrium to lie on the right, so you need to find some kind of optimum to be able to produce as much as possible of the final product in the time unit.

Please disperse, there is nothing to see. Same old thing, repeated in all chemistry all around.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
3K
2
Replies
96
Views
10K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
19
Views
5K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Back
Top