Mystery of the Integers: Unraveling Prob90

  • Thread starter Thread starter igorronaldo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integers Mystery
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the deduction of a table in a puzzle involving integers and player strategies. It highlights that if player X receives an E-triplet, player Y can guarantee that X continues to receive E-triplets in subsequent turns. Consequently, player X must avoid creating an E-triplet to maintain a competitive edge. The confusion arises regarding why player X would not aim to create a non-E-triplet, given the implications for player Y's strategy. Clarifying these strategic interactions is essential to solving the puzzle.
igorronaldo
Messages
9
Reaction score
1
https://www.physics.harvard.edu/uploads/files/undergrad/probweek/prob90.pdf

https://www.physics.harvard.edu/uploads/files/undergrad/probweek/sol90.pdf

This is the puzzle I am trying to understand. Does anybody has any idea how the table on the top of the second page i being deducted?

Some integers are being added and some appear to be randomly substituted...
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The first two of these facts show that if player X receives an E-triplet on a given
turn, then player Y can ensure that X receives an E-triplet on every subsequent
turn. Therefore, X must always create a non-E-triplet, by the first of the three
facts.


Why is that?Shouldn't he try to create a non-E-triplet since this is the LP for Y?
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top