Why are fractals and chaos theory synonymous?

AI Thread Summary
Fractals and chaos theory are often mentioned together, but their connection is debated. Fractals are mathematically defined structures, while chaos theory encompasses a broader study of unpredictable systems. Some argue that chaotic systems can exhibit fractal characteristics, such as in Poincaré maps and bifurcation diagrams, but this does not imply they are synonymous. The discussion suggests linking both concepts to the universe's complexity rather than directly connecting them. Ultimately, using concrete examples of chaotic systems may provide clearer insights into their relationship.
JizzaDaMan
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
I'm doing a presentation in a few weeks on fractals and chaos theory.
To me, their link is more intuitive than mathematically/physically sound, and I'm really struggling to put the link into words.

I've tried googling it, but no where seems to give a satisfactory explanation of the link, they're just stuck together for no apparent reason.

Bear in mind that the explanation needs to be in layman's terms. In my case, a graphical, pictorial or intuitive explanation will be sufficient. An example where the link is clear would also work.

Many thanks for any responses :)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hm ... I don't see any link at all. Fractals are a well-defined, organized structure that can be represented mathematically. Chaos theory is a whole filed of study. I think you are barking up the wrong tree on this. Certainly, to say they are synonymous is just silly.
 
If you take a fractal to mean a (geometrical) structure that is self-similar on a finite or infinite range of scale with regard to some measure, then certain descriptions (like poincare maps [1] and bifurcation diagrams[2]) of chaotic systems may, as you probably know, exhibit a fractal structure. In that sense you could argue that chaos theory utilize some of the concepts (or definitions, if you like) from fractal theory, but I don't think you would be able to take it much further than that. To my knowledge (which unfortunately is some years old in this area) the theory of fractals does not by itself give any additional general insight into the behavior of chaotic systems. For instance, you should not expect to find a link between chaos and fractal that is similar to the hydraulic analogy [3].[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poincaré_map
[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bifurcation_diagram
[3] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydraulic_analogy
 
The reason I say synonymous is that whenever you google chaos theory, you almost always get fractals too.
 
I'm going to be linking fractals and chaos theory to life and the universe, so what about something along these lines:

universe is chaotic; changing the initial 'parameters' would result in a totally different universe.
universe is like a fractal - infinite and similar complexity on every level.

Or something to that effect. So rather than link the two, link them both to the same thing. Thoughts?
 
JizzaDaMan said:
I'm going to be linking fractals and chaos theory to life and the universe, so what about something along these lines:

universe is chaotic; changing the initial 'parameters' would result in a totally different universe.
universe is like a fractal - infinite and similar complexity on every level.

Or something to that effect. So rather than link the two, link them both to the same thing. Thoughts?

Those connections are so tenuous that you're no longer doing mathematics. Why not use an actual chaotic system as an example?
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top