Hole current and Recombination

ViolentCorpse
Messages
190
Reaction score
1
Hello PFers! I hope everyone is doing well. Here's my question:

The way I understand it (imperfectly, of course), forward-biasing a p-n junction diode, the electrons crossover from the n-type material and fall into the holes in the p-type material and then they are conducted through the holes in the valence band. This current in the p-type, I presume, is hole current. But if the holes are being filled by electrons from the other side, wouldn't this recombination process deplete charge carriers, impeding some current flow? Also if a hole is filled, so that an atom is "complete", could a neighboring hole still migrate into the "filled" atom? I mean there would be no vacancy left for migration to occur, so how does it all work?

I am also interested in knowing how an isolated p-type material would behave when applied a potential difference. Is it any different from how the p-type side behaves in a p-n junction diode (for example, does recombination take place?).

Thank you very much for your time!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm sorry you are not generating any responses at the moment. Is there any additional information you can share with us? Any new findings?
 
Greg Bernhardt said:
I'm sorry you are not generating any responses at the moment. Is there any additional information you can share with us? Any new findings?
That's fine! I'm sorry if I'm not clear enough, but I don't know how else to put it.

Please don't waste your precious time trying make sense of what I'm trying to ask, if you're finding it difficult to understand me. This isn't very essential anyway, just a minor curiosity.

Thank you for your attempt! :)
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top