Freezing warm water - Mpemba effect

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Astronuc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Freezing Water
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the Mpemba effect, which is the observation that hot water may freeze faster than cold water. Participants explore various theories, experimental attempts, and related concepts, delving into the implications of this phenomenon in thermodynamics and heat transfer.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note the historical context of the Mpemba effect, mentioning its rediscovery by Erasto B. Mpemba and its implications in thermodynamics.
  • One participant suggests that air trapped in cold water might delay its freezing compared to hot water.
  • A recent analysis of the Mpemba effect is referenced, indicating ongoing research and interest in the phenomenon.
  • Several participants share personal experiences attempting to replicate the Mpemba effect, with mixed results and varying conditions affecting their outcomes.
  • There is a discussion about the influence of temperature differentials on heat transfer rates, with one participant drawing an analogy to racing boxcars down hills.
  • Another participant raises skepticism about the Mpemba effect, suggesting that experimental design choices may play a significant role in observed outcomes.
  • Some participants discuss the relationship between the Mpemba effect and other physical concepts, such as the tautochrone and isochrone curves, although they express uncertainty about direct correlations.
  • Concerns about the complexity of thermodynamic principles are voiced, with one participant admitting a lack of deep understanding in the area.
  • There is a mention of new articles and ongoing curiosity in the scientific community regarding the Mpemba effect.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the Mpemba effect, with no clear consensus on its validity or the mechanisms behind it. Some agree on the need for further experimentation, while others remain skeptical of the phenomenon.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight various factors that may influence the freezing process, such as container dimensions, air gaps, and environmental conditions, but these factors remain unresolved in the discussion.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying thermodynamics, heat transfer, or experimental physics, as well as educators and students exploring the Mpemba effect and related phenomena.

Astronuc
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
2025 Award
Messages
22,586
Reaction score
7,542
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mpemba_effect

This has been brought up in the past, but I did not know the effect had a name.

The Mpemba effect is a name for the observation that hot water freezes faster than cold water.

The effect is named for its rediscoverer, the Tanzanian high-school student Erasto B. Mpemba. He first noticed the effect in 1963 after his account of the freezing of hot ice cream mix in cookery classes, and went on to publish experimental results with Dr. Denis G. Osborne in 1969. At first sight, the effect is contrary to thermodynamics in general.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nice. I'd never think I'd see water 'hysteresis' or whatever it is :P
 
Coanda Effect seems to be also a case of african reference.

this effect, if I remember correctly accounts for the flow of liquids, not vertically, but touching the external walls of the cup.

Best Regards,

DaTario
 
Does the air trapped in cold water delayes its freezing than the hot water?
 
I've tried on many occassions to get hot water to freeze faster than cold, but the cold water allways froze first. Have any of you ever gotten hot water to freeze faster than cold water?
 
I think it may help if one considers that in the context of a body falling through an incline, the shape of the incline have deep influences in the time it takes the body to reach the botton of the curve (suppose the path has one) under uniform gravity field.

Tautochrone (I am not sure about the writings here...) is the curve where the time it takes to cover some vertical distance is minimum.
Isóchrone, if I remenber it well, is the curve (an arc of cicloyd) where the time it takes to reach the minimum from the rest is the same no matter the initial height. Probably it is possible to find curves along which, the higher is the initial position, the sooner the body will reach the minimum. The physical analogy between the thermodynamics of the OP and the mechanics of these curves seems to me as an interesting point here.

Best wishes

DaTario
 
DaTario said:
Tautochrone (I am not sure about the writings here...) is the curve where the time it takes to cover some vertical distance is minimum.
I thought that was the brachistochrone !

I also believe that there is not a direct mapping between the thermodynamics of the mpemba effect and the dynamics of a body falling along a curved path.

Lurch : I got Mpemba to work only once (out of about a half-dozen tries). Someone here (can't recall who..one of the 'matt...'s I think) got it to work repeatedly. A noisy compressor on your fridge will likely ruin any chance of your realizing Mpemba.
 
  • #10
When you have the same volume of hot and cold water, then the mass of the hot water must be smaller than that of the cold water due to differences in the mass densities. So, although the temperature of the hot water is greater then that of the cold water, there less water to freeze, so overall, it might take less time to freeze hot water.
 
  • #11
pseudovector said:
When you have the same volume of hot and cold water, then the mass of the hot water must be smaller than that of the cold water due to differences in the mass densities. So, although the temperature of the hot water is greater then that of the cold water, there less water to freeze, so overall, it might take less time to freeze hot water.

Nope, works when actually using the same amount of water. Really pseudovector, you're making us look like amateurs!

I got it to work once, it was just a case of getting the mass of water right with respect to the container dimensions, and trying a few different samples over the weekend. Only worked a couple of times out of 10 or so.
 
  • #12
There's nothing amateur about overlooking this possibility. I personally know numerous high school physics teachers and some university lecturers who made the same mistake.
When you conducted that experiment, did you cover the top of the glasses?
 
  • #13
pseudovector said:
There's nothing amateur about overlooking this possibility. I personally know numerous high school physics teachers and some university lecturers who made the same mistake.
When you conducted that experiment, did you cover the top of the glasses?


Some I did, some I didn't. Some I left air gaps above the water, some I didn't. Some I surrounded with 'stuff' (frozen peas, I think!), some I left with air surrounding. I was curious as to whether the effect was due to convection, evaporation, or something else. Didn't see anything conclusive, but it's interesting when you see something which really counters intuition and logical thought.
 
  • #14
gradient ;)

come on guys- think about Newton’s law of cooling, the temperature differential establishes the heat transfer rate, so if you have a bigger temperature differential (water temp vs. ambient temp) you will have a faster heat transfer gradient. Here's the fun part. Since the hot water has a larger temperature change to make before freezing it sets up a nice tortoise and the hare race.

Back to the mechanics analogy, its like racing two boxcars down two hills. One is a short track but shallow slope. The other a very long track but a steep slope. Anyway, I wish someone would do a serious experiment on this. My guess is there is some critical temperature value and differential set in which the cold can freeze first on one side and the hot on the other.
 
  • #15
Stobbe, did you read the link?!
 
  • #16
lol, no I did not read the link. But now that I have read it, I feel rather clever yet much less original.

"...This shows that the initially hot water goes faster, but of course it also has farther to go..."

Although I have my MS is in Mechanical Engineering, I wholly despise thermodynamics and have quite a remedial knowledge of it, and therefore it's not surprising that the solution is more complicated than my simple explanation.

Anyway, thanks,

and if anyone is looking for a job and is skilled in optics, they should apply to Northrop Grumman in Chicago IL, we need some more physics nerds :)
 
  • #17
I always argued against this effect using a bit of "hare and tortoise" style reasoning as applied to temperature gradients and heat transfer mechanisms. I always seem glued to the notion that at any instant on their journey toward phase change, L1 (the hotter body of water) must always be at some previous L2 state. But, for any delta t interval, L1 does transfer more heat energy to its surroundings' molecules than L2 so maybe there's some choice set of initial conditions or prevailing circumstances (density of surrounding air, water/air interface surface area, molecular characteristics of container, etc) where they could combine to cause a miraculous finish to the race. However, I'm still skeptical and think that the validity of this phenomena (if there is any) would probably be found in a plethora of deliberate as well as unintentional experimental design choices rather than any inherent fundamental thermodynamic principles. I, like Zeno, really can't see L1 at any instant jumping ahead of L2 - or even catching it for that matter.

At least that's my very biased and probably totally ignorant perspective for the moment :-)

Later...
 
Last edited:
  • #19
Does this phenomenon relate in anyway to cold water rinsing suds off of dishes more efficently than hot water?:rolleyes:
 
  • #20
ZapperZ said:
Even MORE new articles on this. Physics World this month has a good coverage of the ongoing curiosity into this effect.

Zz.
Thanks for the article link.

jf
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
9K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K