Linear algebra proof definition of a stochastic matrix

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

A stochastic matrix A is defined such that every entry is between 0 and 1 inclusive, and each column sums to 1. It is established that there exists a probability vector v satisfying Av = v, indicating that all stochastic matrices have 1 as an eigenvalue. The discussion highlights that stochastic matrices transform probability vectors while maintaining their properties, and it raises the question of whether stochastic matrices always possess n linearly independent eigenvectors. Various proof strategies are suggested, including the use of Jordan canonical form and examining the limit points of iterates of v.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of stochastic matrices and their properties
  • Familiarity with eigenvalues and eigenvectors
  • Knowledge of Markov chains and probability vectors
  • Basic linear algebra concepts, including matrix operations
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of Jordan canonical form in relation to stochastic matrices
  • Learn about the limit of diagonalizable stochastic matrices
  • Explore the proof techniques for eigenvalues and eigenvectors in linear algebra
  • Investigate advanced texts on steady state vectors in stochastic processes
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of linear algebra, and anyone studying Markov chains or stochastic processes will benefit from this discussion.

0rthodontist
Science Advisor
Messages
1,229
Reaction score
0
I was reading through the section of my linear algebra book that deals with Markov chains. It said that in a stochastic matrix A, there is always a probability vector v such that Av = v.

I didn't see a precise definition of a stochastic matrix, but I gather it means that every entry is between 0 and 1 inclusive, and each column sums to 1. And apparently a probability vector is just a stochastic matrix of width 1.

The book declined to prove it, and I am not finding it easy to do so. It means that all stochastic matrices have 1 as an eigenvalue, and also that the entries in at least one eigenvector for that eigenvalue all have the same sign.

I'm thinking, stochastic matrices transform probability vectors into other probability vectors, so if you start with a probability vector v = (v1, ... , vn) and keep transforming it it always stays on the probability vector plane v1 + ... + vn = 1, in the first quadrant/octant/etc. If the stochastic matrix has n linearly independent eigenvectors, then it's simple: just write v as a linear combination of eigenvectors. If any eigenvalues for these eigenvectors are greater than 1 then v eventually goes to infinity under repeated transformations by A, so all eigenvalues are <= 1. There must be an eigenvalue that is 1, because otherwise v would eventually go to 0. And the eigenvalues less than 1 drop away, so the conclusion follows. However, is it true that a stochastic matrix will always have n l.i. eigenvectors?

Also is there a simpler way to prove it, maybe by starting with det (A - I) = 0?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hrm.


First off, a stochastic matrix can have negative entries. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stochastic_matrix


I can see a few approaches that might work.

You could try and do something with the Jordan canonical form.

You could try to write A as a limit of diagonalizable stochastic matrices, and do something with that.

You could try proving the theorem directly by chasing around the iterates of some v, or by looking at the set of limit points of the sequence A^n v. (Armed, of course, with the knowledge that all of the iterates are probability vectors)
 
Last edited:
The book actually gave it as a problem with hints at the end of the section, though it's odd they didn't mention that in the text where I first came across it. Anyway, the trick they used is in the matrix A - I, add to the last row all the rows above it. Since each column of A - I sums to 0, the last row will then be 0.

They said that the part about the steady state vector v = Av having positive entries is given in advanced texts.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K