How Should One Structure a Personal Statement for an REU Application?

  • Thread starter Thread starter leright
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Personal statement
AI Thread Summary
For a personal statement aimed at an REU program like the one at NIST, focus on conveying your motivations and goals rather than providing extensive background information. Start by highlighting your specific interests in semiconductor fabrication technology and how this aligns with your aspirations for graduate school and academic research. Emphasize why the REU at NIST is a crucial step in achieving your career objectives. It's recommended to avoid lengthy introductions about your school or major, as the application will already contain that information. Instead, aim for a concise statement that reflects your passion and individuality. The ideal length is not strictly defined, but brevity is key; a shorter, impactful statement is preferable since reviewers will be sifting through numerous applications. Aim to express your thoughts clearly and succinctly, ensuring that your unique perspective and enthusiasm for the program stand out.
leright
Messages
1,317
Reaction score
19
I am a junior electrical engineering (may double major in engineering physics) student with 2 more years before completing my degree. I hope to go the graduate school/academic research route, as opposed to the industry route. I am looking at doing a SURF/REU with the NIST Electronics and Electrical Engineering Laboratory in Washington D.C. http://www.eeel.nist.gov/surf/ I feel this is exactly what I should be doing as an undergraduate, considering my goals. I am mostly interested in semiconductor fabrication technology.

My question is how should one structure a personal statement for an REU like this? Should I start with background like what school I go to, what my major is, where I am from, etc, and then go into my career goals, technical interests, and follow that up with why I feel the REU will help me reach those goals, or should I omit the introductory background like my school, major, etc?

also, how long should this report be? One page? Two pages? Five pages? In addition, I haven't progressed too far into my engineering curriculum yet, but by the time the summer gets here and I go do this REU, I will have all of my math done, circuits 1 and lab, circuits 2 and lab, digital electronics with lab, advanced digital electronics with lab, microprocessors, and electromagnetic fields and waves, along with all of my humanities requirements and university physics. I am a bit behind because I was a chemistry major for a brief period of time, and that delayed things a bit.

Any guidance would be greatly appreciated. It seems like many of you even have to read these letters for prospective REU students because you are researchers for various universities and national institutions, so I feel I could get some good advice from this forum.

Thanks in advance.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Anyone have any advice? This is the first time I have ever written something like this before so I am a little lost.
 
Although I'm no expert, I'll say ditch the introductory background. They'll know of your background anyway through your application.
Put something in the personal statement that tells something about YOU, why you want to go to NIST, etc.
There is no "ideal" length for the personal statement. If you can express the most in the minimum number of lines, that's the best. These guys would be getting hundreds of applications. They don't have time to read an extremely long personal statement.
 
Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
27
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
29
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top