Why is space-time 3+1 dimensional?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bchui
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Space-time
bchui
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
"Why is our space-time 3+1 dimensional?"
The question had been raised by Kant and Hegel for more than 100 years

Could there be any possibility of "simple explanation" within the framework of Relativity or Quantum Theory:shy:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It seems to me that both Relativity and Quantum Theory are dimensionally-independent theories of nature. So, I think the answer to your question is no.

[Pardon the following sentence... after finally writing it down, it sounds a little playful.] Dimensionality seems to appear in the relationship among the choice of underlying spaces (the "arena"), the choice of fields (the "players"), and the choice of equations, boundary conditions, and additional requirements [like stability, nontriviality, etc] (their "rules") imposed upon them.

One of the most popular examples is the role of dimensionality in Huygens' Principle. Another is the stability of orbits. These appear in:

P. Ehrenfest, “In what way does it become manifest in the fundamental laws of physics that space has three dimensions?” Kon. Akad. Wetens. Amsterdam. Proc. Sec. Sci. 20 (1918), 200–209; reprinted in Collected Scientific Papers, ed. Martin J. Klein (Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1959), pp. 400–409.

See also my posts in
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=89853&highlight=ehrenfest
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=97776&highlight=ehrenfest

There have been some interesting studies, like
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1985GReGr..17..545N
 
I asked a question here, probably over 15 years ago on entanglement and I appreciated the thoughtful answers I received back then. The intervening years haven't made me any more knowledgeable in physics, so forgive my naïveté ! If a have a piece of paper in an area of high gravity, lets say near a black hole, and I draw a triangle on this paper and 'measure' the angles of the triangle, will they add to 180 degrees? How about if I'm looking at this paper outside of the (reasonable)...
Thread 'Relativity of simultaneity in actuality'
I’m attaching two figures from the book, Basic concepts in relativity and QT, by Resnick and Halliday. They are describing the relativity of simultaneity from a theoretical pov, which I understand. Basically, the lightning strikes at AA’ and BB’ can be deemed simultaneous either in frame S, in which case they will not be simultaneous in frame S’, and vice versa. Only in one of the frames are the two events simultaneous, but not in both, and this claim of simultaneity can be done by either of...
Back
Top