Why is space-time 3+1 dimensional?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bchui
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Space-time
Click For Summary
The dimensionality of space-time being 3+1 has been a philosophical question since Kant and Hegel. It is suggested that both Relativity and Quantum Theory do not provide a simple explanation for this dimensionality, as they are dimensionally-independent theories. The relationship between the underlying spaces, fields, and the equations governing them plays a crucial role in understanding dimensionality. Examples such as Huygens' Principle and orbital stability illustrate the significance of three dimensions in physical laws. Overall, the inquiry into why space-time is 3+1 dimensional remains complex and multifaceted.
bchui
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
"Why is our space-time 3+1 dimensional?"
The question had been raised by Kant and Hegel for more than 100 years

Could there be any possibility of "simple explanation" within the framework of Relativity or Quantum Theory:shy:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It seems to me that both Relativity and Quantum Theory are dimensionally-independent theories of nature. So, I think the answer to your question is no.

[Pardon the following sentence... after finally writing it down, it sounds a little playful.] Dimensionality seems to appear in the relationship among the choice of underlying spaces (the "arena"), the choice of fields (the "players"), and the choice of equations, boundary conditions, and additional requirements [like stability, nontriviality, etc] (their "rules") imposed upon them.

One of the most popular examples is the role of dimensionality in Huygens' Principle. Another is the stability of orbits. These appear in:

P. Ehrenfest, “In what way does it become manifest in the fundamental laws of physics that space has three dimensions?” Kon. Akad. Wetens. Amsterdam. Proc. Sec. Sci. 20 (1918), 200–209; reprinted in Collected Scientific Papers, ed. Martin J. Klein (Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1959), pp. 400–409.

See also my posts in
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=89853&highlight=ehrenfest
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=97776&highlight=ehrenfest

There have been some interesting studies, like
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1985GReGr..17..545N
 
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
6K