Where Can I Learn About Neutron Flux in Finite Mediums?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the calculation of neutron flux for a point source within a finite sphere, specifically using the equation φ(r) = (S / (4 π D sinh((R + d) / L))) * (sinh((R + d - r) / L) / r). Participants clarify the application of hyperbolic sine functions in the context of finite mediums, contrasting it with infinite mediums. Key references include John Lamarsh's "Introduction to Nuclear Engineering" and "Nuclear Reactor Theory," which provide foundational knowledge for understanding neutron diffusion equations and boundary conditions in finite systems.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of neutron flux equations in nuclear engineering
  • Familiarity with hyperbolic functions, specifically sinh
  • Knowledge of diffusion equations in one, two, and three dimensions
  • Experience with boundary conditions in finite systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the diffusion equation and boundary conditions in finite mediums
  • Explore the applications of hyperbolic sine functions in neutron transport theory
  • Review "Introduction to Nuclear Engineering" by John Lamarsh for detailed examples
  • Investigate the geometric buckling term and flux profiles in finite reactors as discussed in "Nuclear Reactor Analysis" by Dunderstadt & Hamilton
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in nuclear engineering, particularly those focused on neutron transport theory and reactor physics, will benefit from this discussion.

theCandyman
Messages
397
Reaction score
2
In the text I use for class, the examples and derivations for functions showing the neutron flux at some point, are all about sources within infinite mediums. Now I have a probelm where I must show that neutron flux, for a point source within a finite sphere, is found by the following equation.

<br /> \phi (r)= \frac{S}{4 \pi D sinh \frac{R + d}{L}} \frac{sinh( \frac{R + d - r}{L} ) }{r}<br />

If anyone can tell me where I could learn about flux in finite mediums, I would appreciate it.
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
I believe I have solved this on my own. I found an example dealing with a infinite plane source within a slab.

For reference for anyone else who may have the same question in the future, I will try to compile the answer into this thread later - it is a bit lengthy.

Edit: I am a bit unsure of the hyperbolic sine in the numerator. In the book it is written like this:

sinh \frac{1}{L} (R+d-r)

If that (R+d-r) term is not in the function, I have done the problem icorrectly. Does anyone know which is the correct formula?
 
Last edited:
What text are you using?

Two classic texts are those by John Lamarsh, "Introduction to Nuclear Engineering" and "Nuclear Reactor Theory".

Sinh is appropriate for an infinite planar source in an infinit slab, and I am trying to remember if A sinh (kr)/r or A sin (kr)/r is appropriate for a sphere. Basically, at r=0, the solution must be finite, and the flux is taken as zero at the extrapolated boundary.

Basically, one is solving the diffusion equation in one, two or 3D in a finite system. The complete solution is determined by the boundary conditions. Unlike the inifinite system, where the only loss of neutrons is due to absorption, the finite system must deal with 'leakeage' of neutrons across physical boundaries.

If you write the form of the diffusion equation and the boundary conditions you used, then we can discuss it.
 
Last edited:
I am using the third edition of Introduction to Nuclear Engineering by Lamarsh.

Here's my work:

\phi = A \frac{e^{-\frac{r}{L}}}{r} + C \frac{e^{-\frac{r}{L}}}{r}
The general solution of point source within a medium flux, A and C are constants.

\phi (R+d) = A \frac{e^{-\frac{R+d}{L}}}{R+d} + C \frac{e^{-\frac{R+d}{L}}}{R+d} = 0
Boundary equation.

C = -Ae^{-\frac{2(R+d)}{L}}
Solving for the constant C.

\phi = \frac{A}{r}(e^{-\frac{r}{L}} - e^{(\frac{r}{L}-\frac{2(R+d)}{L})})
Substituting in the value for C.

J = -D \frac{d\phi}{dr}
r^2 J(r) = \frac{DA}{ L}(1 - e^{-\frac{2(R+d)}{L}})
Note: I took the limit as r goes to zero, so e^-(r/L) goes to 1.

\lim_{r\rightarrow 0}r^2 J(r) = \frac{S}{4\pi}
This is the limit for the left hand side of the above.

A = \frac{SL}{4\pi D}(1 - e^{-\frac{2(R+d)}{L}})^{-1}
Solving for constant A.

\phi = \frac{SL}{4\pi D r} \frac{e^{-\frac{r}{L}} - e^{(\frac{r}{L}-\frac{2(R+d)}{L}})}{1 - e^{-\frac{2(R+d)}{L}}}
Equation after substituting in A.

\phi = \frac{SL}{4\pi D r} \frac{e^\frac{R+d-r}{L} - e^{-\frac{R+d-r}{L}}}{e^{\frac{R+d}{L}} - e^{-\frac{R+d}{L}}}
Simplifying by multiplying numerator and denomator by e^[(R+d)/L]

\phi = \frac{SL}{4 \pi D r} \frac{sinh\frac{R+d-r}{L}}{sinh\frac{R+d}{L}}

That is quite a bit of Latex coding, I will be fixing it if I there is a problem.
 
Last edited:
That looks right.

Importantly sinh (kr)/r -> 1 as r -> 0.
 
I have same exercise, but for the line source in a finite medium?
 
I'm assuming you mean an infinite line source and aren't interested in the ends. It will be a very similar derivation, but you will be dealing with polar instead of spherical coordinates.
 
theCandyman...you have an extra L in your solution...
 
This is a more complete solution:
 

Attachments

  • PointSource_Moderator.gif
    PointSource_Moderator.gif
    17.7 KB · Views: 1,471
  • #10
So how would the complete solution change if a second finite moderating sphere surrounds the existing sphere and point source? Thanks in advance.
 
  • #11
Dunderstadt & Hamilton's Nuclear Reactor Analysis Chapter 5 discusses finite reactors. It gives the Geometric Bucking term for a bare sphere as \left(\frac{\pi}{\widetilde{R}}\right)^2 and the flux profile as r^{-1}sin\left(\frac{\pi r}{\widetilde{R}}\right)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K