Why do atoms prefer filled, half filled, or empty shells?

  • Thread starter Thread starter leright
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Atoms Empty
leright
Messages
1,317
Reaction score
19
Why do atoms prefer filled, half filled, or empty shells??

What is the reason for this?? In chemistry, they tell you that atoms are "happier" in these states, but WHY? Nobody can seem to give me an answer. I have a hunch that it has to do with entropy of the various configurations, but can someone explain this to me?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm guessing you mean "subshells".

The reason for the relative stability of a half-filled subshell is the fact that beyond half-filling, you start to put in a second electron into an orbital, increasing its Coulomb energy (alternatively, you can think of this as an increase in the "spin-spin interaction" energy needed to maintain a pair of opposite spins in the same orbital). As for the loss of stability often seen in starting to fill a new subshell, this can be thought of in terms of screening. Electrons within the same subshell are not as good at screening nuclear charge as electrons in a lower subshell. So, when you go from Be to B (for instance), the most energetic electron actually sees a decrease in effective nuclear charge, making it less tightly bound. Hence the lower ionization energy for B compared to Be (opposing the periodic trend).
 
Last edited:
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Back
Top