Static pressure vs. dynamic pressure

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between static pressure and dynamic pressure, particularly in the context of Bernoulli's equation and fluid dynamics. Participants explore the physical mechanisms behind these pressures, their implications in aerodynamics, and how they interact in various scenarios, including airflow over airfoils and through venturi tubes.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that dynamic pressure arises from the collisions of air molecules with surfaces, while static pressure is described as the pressure in a fluid at rest or moving with the fluid.
  • Others argue that static pressure decreases with increased flow speed due to conservation laws, suggesting that the energy stored in static pressure is converted to kinetic energy as the fluid accelerates.
  • A participant questions the definition of pressure, asserting that it involves molecular collisions, and seeks clarification on how dynamic pressure increases correspond to static pressure decreases.
  • Another participant introduces the concept of a pressure gradient in a pipe, noting that static pressure can be zero at the open end, leading to confusion about how static pressure behaves in different scenarios.
  • Some participants discuss the implications of changing dynamic and static pressures on instruments like altimeters and vertical speed indicators, questioning whether they would misread during acceleration.
  • A later reply clarifies that total pressure is constant along a streamline, but not for a given airspeed, and that static pressure at the throat of a venturi is dynamic, not static.
  • One participant explains stagnation pressure and its relevance to airspeed indicators, emphasizing the conversion of dynamic pressure into static pressure at stagnation points.
  • Another participant attempts to simplify the concept of static pressure by comparing it to a direct current voltage.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the definitions and interactions of static and dynamic pressures, with no consensus reached on certain aspects, particularly regarding the implications for instruments and the nature of pressure itself.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express confusion regarding the behavior of static pressure in relation to dynamic pressure, particularly in the context of airflow through venturi tubes and the effects on measurement instruments. The discussion includes various assumptions about fluid behavior and pressure definitions that remain unresolved.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students and professionals in fluid dynamics, aerodynamics, and engineering, as well as those interested in the principles of pressure measurement in aviation contexts.

woleka
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
I am having trouble relating the two quantities of dynamics and static pressure in: 1/2p*v^2 + p = constant, bernoullis equation, to corresponding physical descriptions. In what way do the air molecules act to create both dynamic and static pressure, respectivley? As far as i know, dynamic pressure results from the collisions of air rushing over an airfoil colliding with its surface, as the velocity (and momentum) increase these collisions are more forceful and thus the pressure increase. But if this is the case, then what type of collision during this process defines the static pressure? My main concern here is with static pressure, how does it occur? and why does it decrease with increases in flow speed?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Static pressure is just how it sounds - it is static. It is the pressure you have if the fluid isn't moving (or if you are moving with the fluid). So it doesn't involve the air 'crashing' into the surface of the airfoil.

It decreases with an increase in speed because of conservation law. The best way to look at it is with a large pressure vessel with a small opening. The large pressure vessel has a certain static pressure and no velocity pressure. As the air moves through the opening, it accelerates, releasing the stored energy of static pressure to push and accelerate the air.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Brendan1 and Adilah
" So it doesn't involve the air 'crashing' into the surface of the airfoil. "
I thought that pressure by definition is the 'crashing' into the surface, otherwise how else could it impart a force?
Secondly, I understand the conservation law and how it works, I am just wondering what makes it work the way it does, what exactly happens to the air molecules that causes the dynamic pressure increase to be equal to the static pressure decrease? I like your example with the pressure vessel that , it is very intuitive thanks.
 
woleka said:
" So it doesn't involve the air 'crashing' into the surface of the airfoil. "
I thought that pressure by definition is the 'crashing' into the surface, otherwise how else could it impart a force?
You are talking about individual molecules - I'm talking about a fluid as a continuous medium. Either way, this force is measured in the same way and the momentum of the fluid causes the force to be larger for an equal number of molecular 'crashes'.
Secondly, I understand the conservation law and how it works, I am just wondering what makes it work the way it does, what exactly happens to the air molecules that causes the dynamic pressure increase to be equal to the static pressure decrease? I like your example with the pressure vessel that , it is very intuitive thanks.
Well, what happens as the air moves out of the pressure vessel and accelerates through a pipe? The static pressure at the end of the pipe must be zero (gage pressure) because the end of the pipe is open to the atmosphere. So you have a pressure gradient inside the pipe.

And what else is different when pressure is different? Density. The force of pressure that pushes the air molecules through the opening and into the pipe causes the molecules be pushed apart, lowering the density and thus the pressure.
 
Alright thanks. So i gather that if we considered an area of a wing section;
-if the static pressure > dynamic pressure , the particles collide more often (the fluid is denser) and with smaller force(the momentum is smaller)
-relative to the condition where:
-the static pressure < dynamic pressure (greater momentum, fewer collisions).
 
so if you say that as dynamic pressure increases, static pressure decreases in keeping with constant total pressure, shouldn't the altimeter and VSI now mis read.. i.e. show false climbs??
 
nasir123 said:
so if you say that as dynamic pressure increases, static pressure decreases in keeping with constant total pressure, shouldn't the altimeter and VSI now mis read.. i.e. show false climbs??
No, an atlimeter measures static pressure only, as it varies with altitude. When a plane accelerates, it isn't in a constant total pressure situation: static pressure stays the same but velocity pressure increases.
 
AAh.. so total pressure is constant only for a given airspeed...
What you are normally lead into thinking is that since Total Pressure is constant, an increase in airspeed (dynamic P) results in a drop in Static P...

So, now with comparison to venturi effect... as a streamline of air is accelerated upto the throat of a venturi.. we say the pressure drops.. this is static pressure isn't it.. now as per what you say, this should not happen because only the velocity pressure is going to increase.. I am a little confused.. thanks...

Also.. wrt to aerofoils.. the region of low pressure above is due to the venturi effect isn't it?
 
  • #10
Total pressure is not constant for a given airspeed. It is constant along a streamline.


The pressure at the throat is not static pressure, it has velocity. It is dynamic. The total pressure is constant, and the static pressure reduces substantially.

Yes, you can think of the upper surface of a wing in that respect.
 
  • #11
paulwh
First the pitot static system consists of an altimeter, vertical speed indicator and the airspeed indicator. All are connected to the static port, while only the airspeed indicator is connected to the pitot tube, hence it has two connections.

Second: Stagnation pressure.
If a symmetrically shaped object is placed in a moving airstream, like the leading edge of a wing, the airstream at the very nose of the object would stagnate and the relative flow velocity at this point would be zero. The airstream dynamic pressure will be converted into an increase in static pressure at the stagnation point. Static pressure at the stagnation point is equal to the airstream total pressure --- ambient static pressure plus dynamic pressure. In the surface of the object the airflow will divide and local velocity will increase from zero at stagnation point to some maximum value.

The measurement of free stream dynamic pressure is fundamental to indication of airspeed. Airspeed indicators are simply pressure gauges, which measure dynamic pressure, related to various airspeeds. The flow in a venture and flow over a wing the air keeps moving, but in an airspeed indicator the air is stopped and becomes stagnation pressure plus heat.
From the site below:
“At a stagnation point the fluid velocity is zero and all kinetic energy has been converted into pressure energy. Stagnation pressure is equal to the sum of the free-stream dynamic pressure and free-stream static pressure. [2] Stagnation pressure is sometimes referred to as pitot pressure because it is measured using a pitot tube.”

http://wapedia.mobi/en/Stagnation_pressure

On the top of page 29 of the next site is a cutaway of an airspeed indicator. It consists of a sealed case with a connection to the static port and a bellows connected to the pilot tube. Static ports sense true static pressure of the free airstream. This is a differential pressure indicator with static pressure on the outside of the bellows and dynamic and static pressures on the inside of the bellows. You are left with dynamic pressure q and through gears it moves a needle over a face marked in mph or knots.
http://books.google.ca/books?id=A0b...esult&ct=result&resnum=3#v=onepage&q=&f=false
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #12
What does "paulwh" mean?
 
  • #13
What does "paulwh" mean?

Nothing! I don't know where that comes from.
 
  • #14
nucleus said:
What does "paulwh" mean?

Nothing! I don't know where that comes from.

Well you wrote it, so you must know what it means. Otherwise, why did you write it?
 
  • #15
in the simplest terms static pressure is like DC voltage. dynamic pressure is like an AC signal. It can vary in amplitude and frequency, and like the AC/DC relationship, dynamic pressure can "ride on top" of a static pressure (AC with a DC offset). Many uses besides aerospace applications EX: By reading static and dymanic pressures in a pump output, you can tell volumns about its health and efficiency

dr
 
  • #16
dr dodge said:
in the simplest terms static pressure is like DC voltage. dynamic pressure is like an AC signal. It can vary in amplitude and frequency, and like the AC/DC relationship, dynamic pressure can "ride on top" of a static pressure (AC with a DC offset). Many uses besides aerospace applications EX: By reading static and dymanic pressures in a pump output, you can tell volumns about its health and efficiency

dr

What an odd analogy.
 
  • #17
woleka said:
Alright thanks. So i gather that if we considered an area of a wing section;
-if the static pressure > dynamic pressure , the particles collide more often (the fluid is denser) and with smaller force(the momentum is smaller)
-relative to the condition where:
-the static pressure < dynamic pressure (greater momentum, fewer collisions).

But wait, that can't possibly be right, can it? Unless I'm mistaken, the "greater momentum" associated with dynamic pressure is only parallel to the wall--not perpendicular. If you don't believe me, try using a straight piston to accelerate the fluid. Thus, it must have no effect on the pressure arising from molecular collisions with the wall. And besides, venturi meters show that the pressure from molecular collisions actually decreases, rather than remains the same (right?). So the static pressure must be the variable representing these collisions, not the total pressure.

What then, is the physical significance of the dynamic pressure, and by extension the total? Where is the force in the equation P=F/A for these pressures? The area? If the molecular collisions with the wall are already manifested in the static pressure, what could possibly be manifested in the dynamic pressure? (If the answer is "kinetic energy", please specify how that translates into a force acting over a certain area.)

Thanks for any attempt at helping me.
 
  • #18
hi, Iam testing NACA 0024 (symmetric airfoil) of blade length 300mm and chord length 100mm. i have 12 pressure tabs on the surface of my blade made of steel. i have used micro-manometer to measure pressure distribution at all AOA from 0 to 360 degrees in the wind tunnel of constant velocity= 27 m/s. i have calculated drag and lift... my drag values are negative.. is this possible? what is the reason for this?
 
  • #19
12 pressure taps is nowhere near enough to get accurate measurments on the surface of an airfoil. Plus getting drag from surface pressure measurments is difficult and requires fine resolution.

You should start your own thread instead of posting in an old thread about a different topic.
 
  • #20
can u please tell me how to start a new thread
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
9K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
7K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
20K