Wave packets that feel harmonic potential

jostpuur
Messages
2,112
Reaction score
19
Are there any nice wave packets you could write as a superposition of eigenstate solutions of a one-dimensional harmonic oscillator? The question deals with a situation, where a particle feels a harmonic potential, but is far away from the center and is traveling as a wave packet, probably oscillating like a classical particle before spreading.

I tried the usual gaussian wave packet, but it lead to an integral

<br /> \int\limits_{-\infty}^{\infty} H_n(x) e^{-Ax^2+Bx}dx<br />

which I found too difficult for myself. Do you know if a foolproof technique already exists for integrating this, or if there is other kind of wave packets that are easier?

H_n is Hermite's polynomial.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello,

The problem you meet seems "how to do the integral \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}H_n(x)e^{-Ax^2+Bx}dx"
I try your problem as far as i can ( with brute force >"< ):
In the begining, use the generating function of Hermite polynomials
e^{-t^2+2tx}=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{1}{n!}t^nH_n(x)
Multiply e^{-Ax^2+Bx} both sides and integral over all x:
\text{L.H.S.}=\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}e^{-t^2+2tx}e^{-Ax^2+Bx}dx=\sqrt{\frac{\pi}{A}}e^{-t^2}e^{\frac{(B+2t)^2}{4A}}
\text{R.H.S.}=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{1}{n!}t^n\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}H_n(x)e^{-Ax^2+Bx}dx
One can calculate the Taylor expansion of the L.H.S. and find the coefficient of the \frac{t^n}{n!} term:
\sqrt{\frac{\pi}{A}}\left(\frac{\partial^n}{\partial t^n}e^{-t^2}e^{\frac{(B+2t)^2}{4A}}\right)_{t=0}
The integral you want appeals in the Taylor expansion coefficient of \frac{t^n}{n!} term:
\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}H_n(x)e^{-Ax^2+Bx}dx=\sqrt{\frac{\pi}{A}}\left(\frac{\partial^n}{\partial t^n}e^{-t^2}e^{\frac{(B+2t)^2}{4A}}\right)_{t=0}
Finally, it can be calculated further with Leibniz rule and obtain the result:
\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}H_n(x)e^{-Ax^2+Bx}dx=\sqrt{\frac{\pi}{A}}e^{\frac{B^2}{4A}}\sum_{N=0}^{[\frac{n}{2}]}\frac{n!}{(n-2N)!N!}\left(\frac{1}{A}-1\right)^N\left(\frac{B}{A}\right)^{n-2N}
where [x] gives the maximum integer that is equal to or less than x.


Best regards
 
Last edited:
I'm on the road right now and don't have access to my books, but I do seem to remember that it's possible to construct a Gaussian wave packet for the SHO, and that in fact it doesn't "spread." That is, it's width \Delta x = \sqrt {&lt;x^2&gt; - &lt;x&gt;^2} remains constant as the packet moves back and forth. I remember doing this as an exercise in grad school.
 
Nice trickery, variation! :-p I just tried integration by parts and recursion relations of Hermites polynomials, without success. Seems I should add more tricks to my arsenal.
 
Last edited:
Jostpuur, this is nicely done in 'Quantum Theory' by David Bohm (1951) Dover.
On page 307 he derives the wave packet for the QSHO and gets the non-spreading WP.
 
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Back
Top