Summation analogue of the factorial operation?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the concept of a summation analogue to the factorial operation, questioning if a similar operation exists for sums as the factorial does for products. It highlights that the sum of the first n natural numbers can be expressed as n(n+1)/2, demonstrating how pairs of terms contribute to this result. The conversation references Gauss's method for quickly summing numbers and mentions triangular numbers as a related concept. Additionally, it notes the use of sigma notation in mathematical exposition, particularly in relation to Bernoulli numbers. Overall, the thread delves into the mathematical relationships between summation and factorial operations.
gabee
Messages
175
Reaction score
0
Is there such a thing?

The factorial is usually defined as
n! = \prod_{k=1}^n k if k is a natural number greater than or equal to 1.

Is there an operation that is defined as
\sum_{k=0}^n k
if one wants to find, for instance, something like 5+4+3+2+1?

I ask because I was thinking about binomial expansions and Pascal's triangle, and I'm just curious as to why the factorial operation (!) exists for products but I've never heard of such a thing for sums.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
No, defining that operation would be fairly useless: the summation is equal to n(n+1)/2.
 
Haha, that's why :P
 
In case you wish to see why, we wish to sum : 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 \cdots n. Add the last term, and the first term. We get n+1. Add the second last term, and the second term, we still get n+1. Add the third, and third last, we still get n+1. How many pairs of these (n+1)'s are there? Well if n is even we can easily see the number of pairs is n/2.

However is n is an Odd number, then the number of pairs that add up to (n+1) is (n-1)/2. And we still have a term in the middle, and we can see that one is (n+1)/2. Simple algebra gives the same sum : n(n+1)/2
 
Yes, I've heard the legend about Gauss as a child being asked to sum the numbers 1 through 100 and he realized he could do it in this way...that guy was a genius. I am trying to brush up on my Cal I and II this summer so I can commit this sort of thing to memory again. Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Last edited:
Back
Top