Why Electrons Don't Fall Into Nucleus of Atoms

  • Thread starter Thread starter TalhaZafer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fall Nucleus
TalhaZafer
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi,
Why the electrons in an atom doesn't fall into the nucleus?

May be because of wave-like building of the electron?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Please read our FAQ in the General Physics forum.

Zz.
 
In classical physics the electron lose energy (E) when it accelerate (even centrifugal), by emission of electro-magnetic field dE/dt= - constant*(acceleration)^2 (look for Bremsstrahlung at wikipedia). Without this phenomena you could have classical electrons going in orbits around the nucleus, like planets around the sun.

The solution is quantum mechanics and the photo-electric effect (google it!).

The total energy of the electron + the energy of the (radiated) electromagnetic field is conserved. Therefore if an electron is stimulated to fall from a high quantized energy state to a lower one, the EM-filed must take that energy (the electron loose) ->a photon i emitted with this energy. But still, there is a ground state of the electron (the lowest possible), why emission of photons from this state is impossible.

Spontaneous emission of photons is caused by the vacuum field , since the electro-magnetic field is quantized (QED-theory) dE*dB>constant, like the Heisenberg uncertenity principle.

/Per
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
32
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
290
Replies
13
Views
3K
Back
Top