Understanding the Exchange-Correlation Term in Density Functional Theory

  • Thread starter Thread starter gjfelix2001
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dft
gjfelix2001
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Hi, i can't understan clearly the Exchange-correlation term that appears in the develop of DFT. The only thing i know is that the first comes from the pauli exclusion principle, and the second from the quantum part of the coulomb interaction between electrons. Am i right?? but i wan't to go deeper (not equations necessary) only a little help to understand where exactly this term comes and things like that. Thanks in advance for your help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
gjfelix2001 said:
Hi, i can't understan clearly the Exchange-correlation term that appears in the develop of DFT. The only thing i know is that the first comes from the pauli exclusion principle, and the second from the quantum part of the coulomb interaction between electrons. Am i right?? but i wan't to go deeper (not equations necessary) only a little help to understand where exactly this term comes and things like that. Thanks in advance for your help.

I'm not an expert on DFT. However, I can give you a reference to the paper that I read a while back while trying to understand a certain aspect of DFT. It has a rather detailed discussion on the exchange correlation in DFT and they use it in specific examples. Maybe that might give you an idea on what it is.

http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/physics/9806013

Zz.
 
gjfelix2001 said:
Hi, i can't understan clearly the Exchange-correlation term that appears in the develop of DFT. The only thing i know is that the first comes from the pauli exclusion principle, and the second from the quantum part of the coulomb interaction between electrons. Am i right?? but i wan't to go deeper (not equations necessary) only a little help to understand where exactly this term comes and things like that. Thanks in advance for your help.

If you want an intuitive understanding i can refer you to i post i wrote some time ago :
https://www.physicsforums.com/showpost.php?p=1390599&postcount=16

Once you understand this, it should be more clear why the formula's appear in "they way they do" :)

marlon
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top