Planks length to planks volume?

  • Thread starter Thread starter taylordnz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Length Volume
taylordnz
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
because nothing can be one dimensional, (a line) planks length does not cut it so why hasnt anyone thought of planks volume

planks length (length) x planks length (width) x planks length (depth) = planks volume

now a particle could never be smaller thanks planks volume

whats your opinon?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
because nothing can be one dimensional- taylordnz

Would string theorists agree with that claim? Don't they say that a string is a one-dimensional object?
 
Actually the real object is Planck *area* because Newton constant produces an object with dimensions of area. It has been customary to take the square root of this object and present it in a more intuitive form as a length. For the same token, you could exponentiate it into a Planck volume.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top