Dark Energy: Supernovae Ia, Vacuum Energy & Quintessence

  • Thread starter Thread starter pi.rootpi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dark energy Energy
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the nature of dark energy and its distinction from quintessence. Supernovae Ia, along with data from WMAP, baryon acoustic oscillations, and galaxy cluster mass counts, support the theory of dark energy and its role in the universe's accelerating expansion. Dark energy is primarily associated with a cosmological constant, while quintessence represents a dynamic field that can change over time and space. Current estimates suggest dark energy constitutes about 74% of the universe's critical density, with an equation of state ratio close to -1. Understanding these concepts is crucial for advancing cosmological models and interpretations.
pi.rootpi
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Hi, I have another doubt :biggrin:

In addition to the Supernovae Ia, which more brought us to think the expansion was accelerating? And is there any difference between dark energy and quintessence? Because I've heard that dark energy is like vacuum energy (cosmological constant) and quintessence... I don't really know :-p

Thanks for all, since I'm in Physics Forums I've learned lots of healpful thigs!
 
Space news on Phys.org
There are 3 or 4 independent sets of data that support the dark energy interpretation. Here's a thread on a recent one
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=280456

It's a thread I set up in Cosmo forum in case anyone wanted to discuss the latest confirmation of dark energy----by counting clusters of galaxies of various masses, at near and medium distance (low and medium redshift).

A good way to answer your question is to go here,
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2008/12/16/dark-energy-no-longer-a-surprise/
and look at the figure of overlapping intersecting ovals. These show confidence bounds on two important Cosmology parameters----dark energy fraction (around 0.74) and dark energy equationofstate (around -1)

The four intersecting colored ovals are

Supernovae---yellow oval
WMAP cosmic microwave background data----blue oval
BAO baryon acoustic oscillation data-----green oval
cluster mass counts (the latest stuff)-----pink oval

combined---red blob where they intersect

You will see how each oval helps to narrow down the ranges on these two parameters. Those two numbers go into the cosmo models that give us estimates of other kinds of things that we can compare with observation.

In case anyone is unfamiliar. There is a welldefined energy density of 0.85 nanojoules per cubic meter, called critical density. The number 0.74 means that dark energy is estimated to be 74 percent of critical. That gives us a figure for it in nanojoules per cubic meter, if we want.
The equationofstate is just the ratio of the DE pressure to the DE energy density. As more data accumulates it seems increasingly likely that this ratio is -1.
 
Last edited:
pi.rootpi said:
And is there any difference between dark energy and quintessence? Because I've heard that dark energy is like vacuum energy (cosmological constant) and quintessence... I don't really know :-p

Unlike vacuum energy, quintessence is a new field that could vary in space and time. See

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?p=1327486.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...
Back
Top