Why Does Electron Affinity Have Different Values and Conventions?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Electron affinity (EA) is defined as the energy released when an atom gains an electron, represented by the reaction X- → X + e−. There is a discrepancy in the sign convention used between physicists and chemists; physicists often use a negative sign for EA values, while chemists consistently report them as positive. This difference can lead to confusion, particularly when referencing various educational resources such as Wikipedia and HyperPhysics, which adopt differing conventions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of atomic structure and electron configurations
  • Familiarity with thermodynamic concepts related to energy changes
  • Knowledge of chemical bonding and ionization processes
  • Basic grasp of the periodic table and elemental properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the differences in sign conventions for electron affinity in physics and chemistry
  • Explore the implications of electron affinity on chemical reactivity and bonding
  • Learn about the methods used to measure electron affinity in various elements
  • Investigate the role of electron affinity in predicting periodic trends
USEFUL FOR

Chemists, physicists, educators, and students seeking clarity on the concept of electron affinity and its varying conventions across disciplines.

philip041
Messages
104
Reaction score
0
I have been looking at websites on electron affinity. My notes report it as 'energy released when an atom gains an electron. Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electron_affinity says the amount of energy released when detaching an electron from a singly charged negative ion,[1] i.e., the energy change for the process

X- → X + e−

This seems the reverse? Also on that same Wikipedia page it says you can't get negative elctron affinity values yet on good old hyperphysics http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/Hbase/chemical/eleaff.html it uses a negative convention. I thought this was a modern site?

Can someone clear this up? Cheers!
 
Physics news on Phys.org

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
18K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
16K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
9K