Nuclear Physics - mean-square charge radius of a uniformly charged sphere

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The mean-square charge radius of a uniformly charged sphere with radius R is definitively calculated as < r^2 > = 3*R^2 / 5. The approach involves using the equations for potential inside and outside the sphere, specifically V(r) for r > R and V´(r) for r < R. The normalization constant A is derived from the charge distribution, which is constant up to radius R. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding quantum mechanics (QM) as a prerequisite for tackling problems in nuclear physics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Quantum Mechanics (QM) fundamentals
  • Understanding of potential energy equations in nuclear physics
  • Mathematical statistics related to charge distributions
  • Familiarity with integration techniques in three dimensions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the normalization constant in charge distributions
  • Learn about the Form factor in nuclear physics
  • Explore the relationship between potential energy and mean-square radius
  • Review the mathematical statistics concepts relevant to continuous distributions
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those studying nuclear physics, quantum mechanics, or mathematical statistics, will benefit from this discussion.

wdednam
Messages
33
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Show that the mean-square charge radius of a uniformly charged sphere (with radius R) is
< r^2 > = 3*R^2 / 5

Homework Equations



< r^2 > = \int \varphif* r^2 \varphii dV

\varphif* = exp(-i q dot r)

\varphii = exp(i q dot r)

where q = kf - ki
and pf = h_bar * kf
pi = h_bar * ki

r > R: V(r) = -Ze^2 / (4*pi*e0) * 1/r^2
r < R: V´(r) = -Ze^2 / (4*pi*e0*R) * (3/2 - 1/2 * (r/R)^2)

Ei = 1/2*m*vi

Er0 = J0^2/(2*m*r0^2) + V(r0) or V´(r0) according as r > R or r < R.

J0 = Ji = m*vi*b

where b is the impact parameter and is b = Ze^2/ (4*pi*e0*m*vi^2) * cot(A/2) for hyperbolic orbits, Ei > 0

The Attempt at a Solution



I basically want to know if my approach is correct. I think that I have to find < r0^2 > where r0 is the distance of closest approach to the centre of the charge distribution either inside it (where the electron feels V´(r)) or outside it (where the electron feels V(r)).

I've done some calculations using the radial energy equation, trying to solve for r0^2, but the calculations are a mess and I get a feeling I'm going about it all wrong. The problem is from Krane's Introductory Nuclear Physics, Chapter 3, problem 3.1.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are mixing concepts here, you have tried to evaluate the Form factor, F, with the potential r^2 ..

you want to evaluate the mean square radius, then use formula for distributions:
1 = A\int \rho (\vec{r})d\vec{r}

this is from mathematical statistics. Now use that the distribution of charge is constant up radius R, and for radius larger than R it is zero. Angular integration gives you 4pi, so it is easy to find the normalization constant A.

Then you recall from statistics that the average value of some quantity Q is
&lt;Q&gt; = A\int Q\rho (\vec{r})d\vec{r}

Now you have what you need.
What you did wrong was to mix this up with the Form factor F.
 
Hi Malawi Glenn,

Thank you very much, I used the equations you suggested and got the required result.

I'm concurrently registered for Stat Mech, QM, Nuclear Physics and Solid State Phys this year and realized when I attempted this problem that I should have completed Stat Mech and QM before I took Nuc Phys and SS Phys, but what's done is done and I'll just have to cope.

Thanks again.
 
well yes, QM is pre requirement for both SS phys and Nuc phys. But the math behind is just probability, continuous and discrete.
 
I know it is too late but I have a question.

How could we find the normalization constant?

We have: ρ=3/(4.pi.R^3).

I know that we should also have A=4.pi, but the integration:

1= A ∫ρ dr

does not give that result. Any ideas?
 
up...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
10K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K