Understanding Continuous Space, Spectra, and Planck Units in Quantum Spacetime

  • Thread starter Thread starter denisv
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Continuous
denisv
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
How are continuous space and continuous spectra of operators mathematically consistent with Planck units?

Shouldn't the quantum spacetime be a lattice (or what have you) of integer multiples of the Planck length?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Probably.
In ordinary QM treating spacetime as continuous has the distinct advantage that the wavefunction is a differentiable function. The level at which this is an approximation is really, really small, much smaller than the levels at which one uses ordinary QM. If you're probing those kind of distance scales you probably at least want to be using QFT anyway, if not BSM (beyond the standard model) physics; nobody claims that QM alone is a complete and accurate description of nature (or if they do, they're wrong).
Afraid I can't tell you much about anything more advanced than QM though (soon ... :biggrin: once I've done these exams :( ) Perhaps someone else on here can help. If not, try the dedicated BSM forum.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Back
Top