Closed sets in a topological space

AI Thread Summary
In a topological space (X, τ), it is not necessarily true that any closed subset of A is also a closed subset of B if A is not closed in B. A is closed in itself, but if it is not closed in the larger space B, the statement fails. Compactness does not guarantee that a set is closed, as illustrated by the Zariski topology example. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding the definitions and properties of closed and compact sets in topology. Ultimately, the relationship between closed subsets in different spaces depends on the closure properties of the sets involved.
logarithmic
Messages
103
Reaction score
0
If A\subseteq B are both subsets of a topological space (X,\tau), is it true that any closed subset of A is also a closed subset of B?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
logarithmic said:
If A\subseteq B are both subsets of a topological space (X,\tau), is it true that any closed subset of A is also a closed subset of B?

Note that A is a closed subset of A...
 
Hurkyl said:
Note that A is a closed subset of A...
Hmm, I'm not sure. I never said A was closed. A is in B which is in X. And some other set in A, maybe call it U, is closed. I think the answer would be U is closed in X but I don't quite see why.
 
Hurkyl's point is that any topological space is both open and closed as a subset of itself. If A is NOT closed as a subset of topological space B, since it IS closed as a subset of itself, the statement "any closed subset of A is also a closed subset of B" is false.
 
HallsofIvy said:
Hurkyl's point is that any topological space is both open and closed as a subset of itself. If A is NOT closed as a subset of topological space B, since it IS closed as a subset of itself, the statement "any closed subset of A is also a closed subset of B" is false.
Ahh i see. Thanks. But is that the only problem here? If we insist that A is compact in B, then that fixes the problem and the statement is true, right?
 
Um, just insisting that A is closed is all you need, nothing to do with compactness. In fact compactness won't help you at all - compact does not imply closed (e.g. the Zariski topology on R).
 
?? I thought compact did imply closed!

Oh, I see. I started to give the proof and then realized I was saying "given points p and q construct neighborhoods about p and q that do not intersect". That's not possible in some topological spaces.
 
If you don't know what the Zariski topology is (and Halls does but forget, temporarily) consider the topology on R given by:

U is open if and only if U contains the interval (0,1) - the set (0,1) is in this and is certainly compact, but not closed.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
613
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
5K
Back
Top