Calculating Distribution Functions for Four Coin Toss Experiment

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the distribution functions for an experiment involving four coin tosses conducted 32 times, recording the number of heads. Participants clarify how to compute the measured distribution function using the formula fj=nj/N, where nj is the count of heads and N is the total trials. The expected distribution follows a binomial distribution, with specific calculations provided for different head counts. A participant encounters confusion regarding negative factorials when mistakenly applying the formula with incorrect values for C and xj. The consensus emphasizes that C should consistently be 4, as only four coins are tossed, eliminating the possibility of negative values.
GreyGus
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


For this exercise, four coins are tossed 32 times and the number of heads are recorded for each toss. Each toss falls into one of the following macroscopic states; 0 heads, 1 heads, 2 heads, 3 heads and 4 heads. Suppose the 32 tosses result in the following outcome: 3,2,3,2,2,4,0,3,0,2,0,4,4,2,3,1,2,0,1,3,2,3,1,3,3,2,3,2,3,3,2 and 1. Your task is to count the number of times when 1 heads, 2 heads, ... appears, and to calculate the measured and expected distribution functions.
To calculate the measured distribution function, if nj is the number of counts for jth heads for N trials, then the experimental distribution function is fj=nj/N. For example, the number of counts with zero heads is 4 giving f0=4/32=0.125.
The expected distribution for such an experiment follows a binomial distribution function and is given by
C!/(C-xj)!(xj!)(2^C)
where C is the total number of coins, xj is the number of heads. Thus for the case of 0 heads, f0=4!(4−0)!0!2^4=1/16=0.0625.


Homework Equations


C!/(C-xj)!(xj!)(2^C)


The Attempt at a Solution


    • C
    • 4
    • 10
    • 11
    3
    • fj
    • 0.125
    • 0.3125
    • 0.34375
    • 0.09375
    • distribution
    • 0.25
    • 0.043945313
    • 0.080566406
    • #NUM!
    • Head number
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4

For the last one the factorial is for a negative number for it doesn't work.
Please help. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
How are you getting the factorial of a negative number. C is 4 and xj runs from 0 to 4 so C-xj runs from 4 to 0. There are no negative numbers involved.
 
GreyGus said:

Homework Equations


C!/(C-xj)!(xj!)(2^C)
That gives the probability of a toss having xj heads (or tails). Thus 0 heads has a probability of 1/16. If you toss the coins 32 times, the expected number of 0 head tosses is (1/16)(32) = 2. Compare that expected value with the actual number seen in a particular series of tosses.

(I'm not sure how you got a negative number anywhere.)
 
I had a negative number because for the last one I applied the formula and got
(3!)/(3-4)!(4)!(2^3).

I might have posted the problem wrong, for that I apologize. But it's suppose to be four columns, one for the different C's I counted, fj's, expected distribution and the head number I'm suppose to count. Like if it's 2 ok, so how many 2's are there. So that's how I did it and got a negative number.
 
Last edited:
GreyGus said:
I had a negative number because for the last one I applied the formula and got
(3!)/(3-4)!(4)!(2^3).
This makes no sense. Here you have C = 3, meaning you are flipping 3 coins. And you have xj = 4, meaning you are looking for 4 heads! :bugeye:

As far as I can see, you are always flipping four coins at a time, so C is always 4. xj varies from 0 to 4. No negatives.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top