Tripling fundemental frequency

  • Thread starter Thread starter Strbarrytree
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Frequency
AI Thread Summary
To achieve a fundamental frequency three times greater than 1045 Hz on a bass violin string, the vibrating length must be reduced to one-third of its original length, which is 0.300 m from the lower fixed end. The discussion highlights a disagreement between the original poster and their teacher regarding the relevance of the string's length versus the speed of sound in air. The resonant frequency of the string is primarily determined by its physical properties, not the medium through which the sound travels. An alternative method suggested involves bowing the string at one-sixth of its length while damping certain harmonics. Ultimately, understanding the relationship between frequency and string length is crucial for accurately determining finger placement.
Strbarrytree
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
So the question goes like this- The fundamental frequency of a bass violin string is 1045 Hz and occurs when the string is 0.900 m long. How far from the lower fixed end of the bass violin should you place your fingers to allow the string to vibrate at a fundamental frequency 3 times as great?

I say you take (2*.9)*1045 to get 1881 m/s because of v=f*w, then you take (1881/(1045*3))/2 to get .3 because of f=v/2l, and .3 would be the answer which would make sense since .3=(1/3).9

My teacher who is a smart man says you would disregard the information you got about the length of the string (the 0.900 m) and just take (340(speed of sound in air)/(3*1045))/2 or something like that he got like .84 or .084 which doesn't add up to the equation I just said, but that's what he said to do because he said it has to travel through air so we can hear it.

I think that that is irrelevant because it is not asking for how we perceive the frequency but rather what the string is actually doing. So I just kinda want an answer to know whose right so if this is on my text I know what to do. Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The resonant frequency of a string is independent of the air surrounding the string.

The weight or loading of a string per unit length will be constant, we assume the tension in the string also remains constant. You can analyse that string as a transmission line with a fixed velocity factor supporting a standing wave.

To get three times the frequency you must reduce the transit time to 1/3 of the original. That says the excited section of the string needs to be only 1/3 as long.

An alternative might be to bow it at 1/6 of the length while killing the fundamental and second harmonics with a finger at the 1/3 point. Then there would be three cycles of third harmonic wave propagating on the full length of the line or string.
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...

Similar threads

Back
Top