Design 1T Solenoidal Electromagnet w/ Core Permeability>1000

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the design of a 1T solenoidal electromagnet with a core permeability greater than 1000, exploring the challenges of measuring magnetic field strength and the effects of core saturation. Participants share various methods for measuring magnetic fields, particularly in relation to solenoids and permanent magnets.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Experimental/applied
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions how to apply the permeability formula after saturation, suggesting the use of u0 instead of u0ur.
  • Another participant provides a permeability curve for soft iron and mentions that 300 amp-turns per meter should achieve 1 Tesla in a long solenoid, referencing a specific textbook for the equation.
  • Several participants discuss methods for measuring the field strength of permanent magnets, including integrating coils, Hall Effect sensors, and proton resonance NMR, noting the difficulties associated with each method.
  • One participant shares their experience with a Hall Effect sensor that saturated at 0.4T and expresses uncertainty about the relationship of magnetic field strength with distance from the magnet.
  • Another participant mentions the challenges of using proton NMR in inhomogeneous fields and provides links to online calculators for axial field densities of cylindrical neodymium magnets.
  • One participant shares a voltage integrator circuit for measuring magnetic fields based on Faraday's law of induction.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying opinions on the methods for measuring magnetic fields and the effects of core saturation, with no consensus reached on the best approach or the relationship of magnetic field strength with distance.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations in measurement accuracy and the complexity of setups for different methods, as well as the dependence on specific conditions such as sensor calibration and the geometry of the magnetic field.

likephysics
Messages
638
Reaction score
4
I was trying to get the numbers to design a 1T solenoidal electromagnet with a core of permeability >1000 (electric steel or Permalloy). I think the permeability saturates at some field strength(0.2T?). But I am not sure how to use the formula after saturation. should I just use u0 instead of u0ur?
How exactly is the field strength measured? Say for a solenoid and a button type permanent magnet. At what distance from the surface?
I am using the formula B=u0ur*n*I
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Here in thumbnail is the permeability curve for soft iron. 300 amp-turns per meter should push soft iron above 1 Tesla inside a long solenoid. The equation for the field inside a finite length solenoid is given in Smythe "Static and Dynamic Electricity" 3rd edition page 297.

Bob S
 

Attachments

  • Iron_permeability3.jpg
    Iron_permeability3.jpg
    32.2 KB · Views: 1,065
Bobs, thanks. That makes sense. I just need to grab the static and dynamic electricity book.
 
Smythe's exact solution for the on-axis B field in a finite-length solenoid is posted in the thumbnail.

Bob S
 

Attachments

  • Solenoid_Smythe_soln.jpg
    Solenoid_Smythe_soln.jpg
    40.1 KB · Views: 1,417
Thanks. Any idea how you measure the field of a permanent magnet?
I bought one of those neodymium magnets. They are supposed to be 1T. But I am not sure how to measure the field.
 
I have used three ways. All are difficult.
1) Integrating coil. Wrap 100-200 turns of #40 wire into a coil with ID the same as the magnet OD. Count # turns. Build an integrating circuit with about 1 minute time constant. R series = 100 k, C feedback= 600 uF. Put a 10 meg bleed resistor in parallel with C. choose a low bias current, low voltage offset op amp.
2) Use a Hall Effect Sensor. Make good differential amplifier op amp to amplify signal. Calibration accuracy of sensor is only about +/- 20%
3) Proton resonance NMR. very accurate. Very difficult to set up.
Bob S.
 
Proton NMR seems intriguing.
I tried (2), my hall effect sensor (from allegro) saturated at 0.4T when the sensor was close to the magnet (~2 inches). I know mag field drops as u go away from the magnet, but I don't know the relationship(1/r^2?).
 
likephysics said:
Proton NMR seems intriguing.
I tried (2), my hall effect sensor (from allegro) saturated at 0.4T when the sensor was close to the magnet (~2 inches). I know mag field drops as u go away from the magnet, but I don't know the relationship(1/r^2?).
I am aware that the Allegro units saturate. I attach an Analog Devices datasheet that may not saturate, IF the offset adjustment allows for extending the linear range. The surface mount package is difficult to mount, however.
http://www.analog.com/static/imported-files/data_sheets/AD22151.pdf
Proton magnetic resonance is difficult in inhomogeneous fields because it requires very small NMR samples, of the order of 1 mm cubed. You also need a grid-dip equivalent circuit (do you remember grid-dip resonance detecting circuits?) to detect resonance.
Bob S
[added] Here is a site that calculates axial field densities for any size cylindrical neodymium magnet.
http://www.magnetsales.com/Design/Calc_filles/FluxVsDistance-Disc.asp
Here is another calculator:
http://www.arnoldmagnetics.com/mtc/calc_gauss_cyl.htm
Here is a third site:
http://www.dextermag.com/Calculation.aspx?mode=input&id=FieldCalcCylinder
Bob S
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The two attached thumbnail drawings outline a voltage integrator circuit for measuring magnetic fields using the Faraday induction law.
Bob S
 

Attachments

  • Slide1.JPG
    Slide1.JPG
    33.8 KB · Views: 780
  • Slide2.JPG
    Slide2.JPG
    39.3 KB · Views: 767

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K