Design 1T Solenoidal Electromagnet w/ Core Permeability>1000

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on designing a 1T solenoidal electromagnet with a core permeability greater than 1000, specifically using materials like electric steel or Permalloy. Key formulas include B = μ₀μᵣnI, with references to Smythe's "Static and Dynamic Electricity" for finite-length solenoid calculations. Measurement techniques for magnetic fields are explored, including integrating coils, Hall Effect sensors, and proton resonance NMR, each with specific challenges and accuracy considerations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electromagnetism principles, specifically solenoids and magnetic fields.
  • Familiarity with the formula B = μ₀μᵣnI for calculating magnetic fields.
  • Knowledge of measurement techniques for magnetic fields, including Hall Effect sensors and NMR.
  • Basic electronics skills for building circuits, such as integrating circuits and amplifiers.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties and applications of electric steel and Permalloy in electromagnet design.
  • Learn about the construction and calibration of integrating circuits for magnetic field measurement.
  • Explore advanced Hall Effect sensor options, including those from Analog Devices, for improved measurement accuracy.
  • Investigate the principles of proton magnetic resonance (NMR) and its application in measuring magnetic fields.
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, physicists, and hobbyists involved in electromagnet design, magnetic field measurement, and those interested in advanced measurement techniques for permanent magnets.

likephysics
Messages
638
Reaction score
4
I was trying to get the numbers to design a 1T solenoidal electromagnet with a core of permeability >1000 (electric steel or Permalloy). I think the permeability saturates at some field strength(0.2T?). But I am not sure how to use the formula after saturation. should I just use u0 instead of u0ur?
How exactly is the field strength measured? Say for a solenoid and a button type permanent magnet. At what distance from the surface?
I am using the formula B=u0ur*n*I
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Here in thumbnail is the permeability curve for soft iron. 300 amp-turns per meter should push soft iron above 1 Tesla inside a long solenoid. The equation for the field inside a finite length solenoid is given in Smythe "Static and Dynamic Electricity" 3rd edition page 297.

Bob S
 

Attachments

  • Iron_permeability3.jpg
    Iron_permeability3.jpg
    32.2 KB · Views: 1,052
Bobs, thanks. That makes sense. I just need to grab the static and dynamic electricity book.
 
Smythe's exact solution for the on-axis B field in a finite-length solenoid is posted in the thumbnail.

Bob S
 

Attachments

  • Solenoid_Smythe_soln.jpg
    Solenoid_Smythe_soln.jpg
    40.1 KB · Views: 1,408
Thanks. Any idea how you measure the field of a permanent magnet?
I bought one of those neodymium magnets. They are supposed to be 1T. But I am not sure how to measure the field.
 
I have used three ways. All are difficult.
1) Integrating coil. Wrap 100-200 turns of #40 wire into a coil with ID the same as the magnet OD. Count # turns. Build an integrating circuit with about 1 minute time constant. R series = 100 k, C feedback= 600 uF. Put a 10 meg bleed resistor in parallel with C. choose a low bias current, low voltage offset op amp.
2) Use a Hall Effect Sensor. Make good differential amplifier op amp to amplify signal. Calibration accuracy of sensor is only about +/- 20%
3) Proton resonance NMR. very accurate. Very difficult to set up.
Bob S.
 
Proton NMR seems intriguing.
I tried (2), my hall effect sensor (from allegro) saturated at 0.4T when the sensor was close to the magnet (~2 inches). I know mag field drops as u go away from the magnet, but I don't know the relationship(1/r^2?).
 
likephysics said:
Proton NMR seems intriguing.
I tried (2), my hall effect sensor (from allegro) saturated at 0.4T when the sensor was close to the magnet (~2 inches). I know mag field drops as u go away from the magnet, but I don't know the relationship(1/r^2?).
I am aware that the Allegro units saturate. I attach an Analog Devices datasheet that may not saturate, IF the offset adjustment allows for extending the linear range. The surface mount package is difficult to mount, however.
http://www.analog.com/static/imported-files/data_sheets/AD22151.pdf
Proton magnetic resonance is difficult in inhomogeneous fields because it requires very small NMR samples, of the order of 1 mm cubed. You also need a grid-dip equivalent circuit (do you remember grid-dip resonance detecting circuits?) to detect resonance.
Bob S
[added] Here is a site that calculates axial field densities for any size cylindrical neodymium magnet.
http://www.magnetsales.com/Design/Calc_filles/FluxVsDistance-Disc.asp
Here is another calculator:
http://www.arnoldmagnetics.com/mtc/calc_gauss_cyl.htm
Here is a third site:
http://www.dextermag.com/Calculation.aspx?mode=input&id=FieldCalcCylinder
Bob S
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The two attached thumbnail drawings outline a voltage integrator circuit for measuring magnetic fields using the Faraday induction law.
Bob S
 

Attachments

  • Slide1.JPG
    Slide1.JPG
    33.8 KB · Views: 767
  • Slide2.JPG
    Slide2.JPG
    39.3 KB · Views: 755

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K