Can a waterspout and whirlpool cancel each other out?

  • Thread starter Thread starter BkBkBk
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
A waterspout and whirlpool would likely not cancel each other out due to their differing driving forces—atmospheric for the waterspout and oceanic for the whirlpool. The interaction at their point of contact may be interesting, but it is unlikely to result in significant changes to either vortex. Both phenomena are relatively weak compared to the larger forces that create them, meaning they wouldn't amplify or disrupt each other effectively. Ultimately, the lack of direct interaction between the atmospheric and oceanic forces suggests minimal impact on either vortex. The conclusion is that a waterspout and whirlpool would not significantly influence one another.
BkBkBk
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
what would happen if a waterspout crossed a whirlpool,or if any two vortexes interacted in that way,would the top vortex disrupt the bottom one? would it matter which way each was rotating?
would they reach equilibrium,or cancle each other out or speed each other up?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is a pretty complicated fluid dynamics question, but I'll do my best to make some guesses. In general, I'd have to guess that a whirlpool-waterspout interaction would not do much. Waterspouts are driven by forces in the air, and whirlpools are driven by forces in the water. The actual point of contact might be pretty interesting, but would a waterspout and opposing whirlpool cancel each other? I'd have to say no. Neither could a complimentary whirlpool-waterspout pair amplify itself.

Again, a waterspout is a fairly weak result of powerful atmospheric forces, and a whirlpool is similarly weak when compared to the oceanic forces that cause it. To cancel a whirlpool or waterspout would be to cancel the tremendous forces that bring them to be. Given that these atmospheric and oceanic forces aren't really directly interacting, I doubt they'd affect each other much.
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top