I Hamiltonian Mechanics: why paths in state space never cross each other

  • Thread starter dRic2
  • Start date

dRic2

Gold Member
512
89
I'm reading a book about analytical mechanics and in particular, in a chapter on hamiltonian Mechanics it says:

"In the state space (...) the complete solutionbof the canonical equations is pictured as an infinite manifold of curves which fill (2n+1)-dimensional space. These curves never cross each other. Indeed, such crossing would mean that two tangents are possible at the same point of the state space , but that is excluded because of the canonical equations which give a unique tangent at any point of the space."

I'm not following very well the argument of the author. Can someone help me, please ?

Thanks
Ric
 

Vanadium 50

Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Education Advisor
23,099
5,388
Suppose paths could cross, and further suppose I prepare the system in the state at the crossing point. How does the state evolve? Which path does it take?
 
28,149
4,533
The canonical equations basically say from any point in phase space which direction you go. Each point has only one direction. If there is a crossing then there would be two directions to go from the same point.
 

anorlunda

Mentor
Insights Author
Gold Member
7,304
4,079
If there is a crossing then there would be two directions to go from the same point.
Adding to that, there would also be two directions in past time to come from. Alternate histories like that are not allowed in physics.
 

Delta2

Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
2,239
618
Should I open a mini can of worms here and through the question whether the universe is deterministic or non deterministic. If the universe is non deterministic then we can certainly have paths in the state space crossing each other.
BUT since we are in the classical physics subforum and the book the OP is referring to is for classical Hamiltonian mechanics, the universe is always deterministic for classical physics. Not sure if we can say the same for quantum physics though.
 

dRic2

Gold Member
512
89
So basically, if I set a point, giving all the coordinates, according to Hamilton's equation I can then predict the motion, but if two or more paths intersected in that point, geometrically I wouldn't be able to choose one path: I would need an other information. But that contradicts Hamilton's equations which assure me that the motion is uniquely defined if I gave all the coordinates of that point. Did I get it ?

If I can bother a little more, the line just below this one says:

"The geometrical and analytical picture we get here is in complete analogy with the motion of a fluid"

Can you provide some more hints please?

Thank you very much
Ric
 

anorlunda

Mentor
Insights Author
Gold Member
7,304
4,079
If the universe is non deterministic then we can certainly have paths in the state space crossing each other.
That doesn't follow. This thread is related to conservation of information.
See:


And the article linked from there giving the quantum version of Lioville's Theorum

 

hilbert2

Science Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
1,246
379
The kind of differential equations that can describe some real-world physics always have a unique solution. I'm not sure, though, whether it could be possible to construct a sequence of Hamiltonian systems with an increasing number of degrees of freedom, such that in the limit of infinite dimensions the equations of motion fail to have a unique solution.
 
307
122
So basically, if I set a point, giving all the coordinates, according to Hamilton's equation I can then predict the motion, but if two or more paths intersected in that point, geometrically I wouldn't be able to choose one path: I would need an other information. But that contradicts Hamilton's equations which assure me that the motion is uniquely defined if I gave all the coordinates of that point. Did I get it ?

If I can bother a little more, the line just below this one says:

"The geometrical and analytical picture we get here is in complete analogy with the motion of a fluid"

Can you provide some more hints please?

Thank you very much
Ric
That's overcomplicating it just a little, although it is correct. Here's what I would say:

Hamilton's equations of motion for a system define a vector field that gives a vector for every value of (q,p) in phase space. When supplied with initial conditions, Hamilton's equations can be solved for a curve that represents the motion of the system in phase space, in the sense that we can say that the state of the system is represented as a particle that moves along this curve with its location on the curve parameterized by time.

The vectors defined by Hamilton's equations are tangent to the curve. If there was a point on the curve where it intersected itself, then it would mean that the vector tangent to the curve at that point would have two directions at once, which is mathematically impossible (how can a vector have two directions?).

This article might help to clarify:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Integral_curve
 

dRic2

Gold Member
512
89
Thanks for the reply, but I don't find it that complicated :biggrin:

BTW I solved this other issue some days ago and forgot to mention
"The geometrical and analytical picture we get here is in complete analogy with the motion of a fluid"

Can you provide some more hints please?
It think all my doubts regarding the question have been answered. Thank to you all :)
 

Want to reply to this thread?

"Hamiltonian Mechanics: why paths in state space never cross each other" You must log in or register to reply here.

Related Threads for: Hamiltonian Mechanics: why paths in state space never cross each other

Replies
2
Views
12K
Replies
2
Views
273
Replies
2
Views
442
Replies
1
Views
558
Replies
2
Views
309
  • Posted
Replies
2
Views
914
Replies
2
Views
535
Replies
1
Views
873

Physics Forums Values

We Value Quality
• Topics based on mainstream science
• Proper English grammar and spelling
We Value Civility
• Positive and compassionate attitudes
• Patience while debating
We Value Productivity
• Disciplined to remain on-topic
• Recognition of own weaknesses
• Solo and co-op problem solving

Hot Threads

Top