What Determines the Observer Effect in Quantum Physics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter J.W. Coleman
  • Start date Start date
J.W. Coleman
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
To begin, I am an avid physics enthusiast and after reading countless books, there are a few questions that pester me in reference to the probability of an electrons location and the 'observer' which changes the electrons location or speed.

I understand that if you observe the electron, you cannot get an accurate reading, and that if you look at the electron, because it is in a super-position state and is merely a probability, its history does not exist until it is observed.

What then, is doing the observing? Is it human consciousness, photons, or simple matter interactions? Could anyone please explain this to me as simply as possible?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Observation does not have to be conscious; it is any form of interaction where the particle's location will be determined. So, any or all of the 'whats' you mention will do.
 
That's what I thought, thank you very much!
 
With that solved, however, in what instance is an electron not being interacted with, or is there ever a situation in which this occurs?

If it is the case in which the situation never occurs, then why is this relevant?
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
124
Views
8K
Replies
5
Views
952
Replies
2
Views
999
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
25
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Back
Top