Is Force Ever a Function of Acceleration in Classical Mechanics?

AI Thread Summary
In classical mechanics, forces are typically not expressed as direct functions of acceleration due to dimensional inconsistencies. The discussion highlights that while acceleration may change over time, forces generally depend on position, velocity, and time rather than acceleration alone. A specific example mentioned involves a string attached to a ball, where the force exerted by the ball on the string can be related to its acceleration. However, the consensus is that force is not commonly measured or plotted against acceleration in standard practice. Overall, the professor's assertion emphasizes the conventional approach to analyzing forces in dynamics.
GreenLRan
Messages
59
Reaction score
0
In class today, my professor said that you will never find a force that is a function of acceleration.

Why is this?


M\ddot{x}(t) = F(x,y,z,\dot{x},\dot{y},\dot{z},t)
M\ddot{y}(t) = F(x,y,z,\dot{x},\dot{y},\dot{z},t)
M\ddot{z}(t) = F(x,y,z,\dot{x},\dot{y},\dot{z},t)

This is in a classical mechanics / dynamics course
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Usually forces vary with time, because acceleration would vary with time. I think he meant that you would not find a function such that F=2a2+a+3 as that would not work dimensionally.
 
What about a reaction force? For example a string attached to a ball and accelerating the ball, the force the ball exerts on the string is a function of the acceleration of the ball.
 
rcgldr said:
What about a reaction force? For example a string attached to a ball and accelerating the ball, the force the ball exerts on the string is a function of the acceleration of the ball.

Well that is what I am saying, I think your professor meant that you would not usually measure force with acceleration or well plot force against acceleration.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?

Similar threads

Back
Top