Deriving Relativistic Momentum

soothsayer
Messages
422
Reaction score
5
I'm having some problems trying to figure out how to derive relativistic momentum. The way it was explained to me, classically, p=mv=m(dx/dt),but dx/dt is measured differently in different reference frames. So, if you look at time dilation, t=ɣt' where ɣ= 1/(1-(v/c)^2)^1/2 and t' is time in the moving inertial reference frame. So, dt/dt' = ɣ. m(dx/dt') = m(dx/dt)(dt/dt') = ɣmv. So, p=ɣmv, which is the given formula for special relativistic momentum (though usually u is used instead of v to distinguish velocities of frames and objects). I get all of this.

My question is, don't we have to find p=m(dx'/dt')? if dx/dx' = ɣ and dt/dt' = ɣ, then
m(dx'/dt') = m(dx/dt)(dt/dt')(dx'/dx) = mv(ɣ/ɣ) = mv.
Or, basically, x'=x/ɣ and t'=t/ɣ, so dx/dt = dx'/dt'. Length contracts at the same rate time dilates (dictated by value of ɣ). So where does p=ɣmv come from?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
soothsayer said:
I'm having some problems trying to figure out how to derive relativistic momentum. The way it was explained to me, classically, p=mv=m(dx/dt),but dx/dt is measured differently in different reference frames. So, if you look at time dilation, t=ɣt' where ɣ= 1/(1-(v/c)^2)^1/2 and t' is time in the moving inertial reference frame. So, dt/dt' = ɣ. m(dx/dt') = m(dx/dt)(dt/dt') = ɣmv. So, p=ɣmv, which is the given formula for special relativistic momentum (though usually u is used instead of v to distinguish velocities of frames and objects). I get all of this.
Hmm...this doesn't make a lot of sense to me. I think either someone gave you a bad explanation or your notes on it are garbled.

soothsayer said:
Or, basically, x'=x/ɣ and t'=t/ɣ
But this isn't how the Lorentz transformation actually works.

There are lots of different ways of approaching relativistic energy and momentum. If the approach your instructor used isn't working for you (or for me), why not just look at a different derivation? For example, one can get there by requiring that the results of collisions make sense in all frames of reference: http://www.lightandmatter.com/html_books/6mr/ch01/ch01.html#Section1.3
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Four-Momentum_doc1.jpg

Four-Momentum_doc2.jpg

Four-Momentum_doc3.jpg

Four-Momentum_doc4.jpg

Four-Momentum_doc5.jpg
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
Back
Top