Principal Virtual Work vs Principal of Minimum Potential Energy

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the differences between Principal Virtual Work (PVW) and Principal of Minimum Potential Energy (PMPE) in structural analysis. PMPE involves calculating actual energies when varying parameters in a system, which need not be in equilibrium and can lack external forces. In contrast, PVW requires the system to be in equilibrium and to have external forces acting, focusing on the relationship between internal and external forces and geometrical compatibility. The example of a soap bubble illustrates PMPE, while PVW is essential for calculating displacements under complex loading conditions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of structural analysis concepts
  • Familiarity with potential energy principles
  • Knowledge of equilibrium conditions in mechanics
  • Basic grasp of virtual work theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the applications of Principal of Minimum Potential Energy in fluid mechanics
  • Explore the derivation and applications of Virtual Work in structural engineering
  • Investigate the relationship between energy methods and equilibrium in mechanics
  • Learn about the implications of geometrical compatibility in structural analysis
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in structural engineering, mechanics, and physics who seek to deepen their understanding of energy principles and equilibrium in systems.

Abe21599
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hello

Just had a quick question for a structures class. When attempting a problem, what's the main difference between applying PVW and PMPE? What would classify a problem in using one over the other?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
OK PMPE is the calculation of the actual energies involved when we vary a parameter for a system.
The system need not be in equilibrium.
There need be no external forces acting.

For example the potential energy of a soap bubble depends on its surface area, which in turn depends on its shape, and PMPE says it will take a shape which minimises this.
Looking at shapes we find that as we vary the shape the one with the minimal surface area is a sphere, which is the shape of a soap bubble.

Virtual Work is more difficult conceptually and is not a minimum theorem. In fact the energies (work) calculated have no reality, hence the term.

The system must be in equilibrium.
There must be external forces acting.

Structural VW stems from the fact that in responding to loads any system must satisfy two independent conditions

Static equilibrium of forces (internal and external) acting (set1)
&
Geometrical compatibility of strains or displacements (set2)

Since work is the product of force and distance any such multiplication has the dimensions of work.

So multiplying set 1 by set 2 has the dimensions of work. This is known as the virtual work since either set 1 or 2 may be different from the actual ones applied to the system.

VW is particularly if we wish to calculate a single displacement of a complicated set of loads and replace the set with a single load in the direction of the desired displacement.
 
Thanks for the detailed response. that definitely clears up a lot of things.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K