Weight Measurement on Mutually Orbiting Planets

Jonnyb42
Messages
185
Reaction score
0
So at the end of the lengthy thread https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=404650", a similar but new question of mine arose:

If you consider the Earth rotating, you can measure differences in weight at different points on the Earth (namely, the extremes being the poles and the equator.) I am assuming you know why, etc.
Now if you have two mutually orbiting planets, I wanted to verify that if you measured weight at the point on a planet facing the other planet, and compared it with the weight measured at the opposite side of the planet, they should be approximately the same. (Assuming the diameters of the planets are negligible compared to their separation)
Or also, I am verifying that their revolution does not affect this measurement.

P.S.
I am asking this because when I originally posted the above thread, I had in mind that that measurement was not the same, as if it were similar to a merry-go-round, however I recently realized that this shouldn't be so, and before I went on to think about it more I wanted to verify that I'm right.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Tidal gravity is measurable. The difference is greatest not between the zenith and nadir points but between the point at which the other planet is at zenith (or nadir) and a point where the other planet is on the horizon. For example, the tidal gravitational effects due to the Sun and Moon on the surface of the Earth vary by up to 0.3 milligal over time (a gal is 1 cm/s2), a quantity that is easily measurable by precision gravimeters.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
Back
Top